Thread (14 messages) 14 messages, 4 authors, 2024-01-26

Re: [PATCHv3 1/1] block: introduce content activity based ioprio

From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Date: 2024-01-26 08:55:44
Also in: linux-fsdevel, linux-mm, lkml

On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 03:59:48PM +0800, Zhaoyang Huang wrote:
loop more mm and fs guys for more comments
I agree with everything Damien said.  But also ...
quoted
+bool BIO_ADD_FOLIO(struct bio *bio, struct folio *folio, size_t len,
+               size_t off)
You don't add any users of these functions.  It's hard to assess whether
this is the right API when there are no example users.
quoted
+       activity += (bio->bi_vcnt + 1 <= IOPRIO_NR_ACTIVITY &&
+                       PageWorkingset(&folio->page)) ? 1 : 0;
folio_test_workingset().
quoted
+       return bio_add_page(bio, &folio->page, len, off) > 0;
bio_add_folio().
quoted
+int BIO_ADD_PAGE(struct bio *bio, struct page *page,
+               unsigned int len, unsigned int offset)
+{
+       int class, level, hint, activity;
+
+       if (bio_add_page(bio, page, len, offset) > 0) {
+               class = IOPRIO_PRIO_CLASS(bio->bi_ioprio);
+               level = IOPRIO_PRIO_LEVEL(bio->bi_ioprio);
+               hint = IOPRIO_PRIO_HINT(bio->bi_ioprio);
+               activity = IOPRIO_PRIO_ACTIVITY(bio->bi_ioprio);
+               activity += (bio->bi_vcnt <= IOPRIO_NR_ACTIVITY && PageWorkingset(page)) ? 1 : 0;
+               bio->bi_ioprio = IOPRIO_PRIO_VALUE_ACTIVITY(class, level, hint, activity);
+       }
why are BIO_ADD_PAGE and BIO_ADD_FOLIO so very different from each
other?
quoted
 static __always_inline __u16 ioprio_value(int prioclass, int priolevel,
-                                         int priohint)
+               int priohint)
why did you change this whitespace?
quoted
 {
        if (IOPRIO_BAD_VALUE(prioclass, IOPRIO_NR_CLASSES) ||
-           IOPRIO_BAD_VALUE(priolevel, IOPRIO_NR_LEVELS) ||
-           IOPRIO_BAD_VALUE(priohint, IOPRIO_NR_HINTS))
+                       IOPRIO_BAD_VALUE(priolevel, IOPRIO_NR_LEVELS) ||
+                       IOPRIO_BAD_VALUE(priohint, IOPRIO_NR_HINTS))
ditto
quoted
                return IOPRIO_CLASS_INVALID << IOPRIO_CLASS_SHIFT;

        return (prioclass << IOPRIO_CLASS_SHIFT) |
                (priohint << IOPRIO_HINT_SHIFT) | priolevel;
 }
-
more gratuitous whitespace change
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help