Re: [PATCH V2] io_uring: cancelable uring_cmd
From: Ming Lei <hidden>
Date: 2023-09-22 15:25:04
Also in:
io-uring
On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 09:02:44AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 9/22/23 8:28 AM, Ming Lei wrote:quoted
uring_cmd may never complete, such as ublk, in which uring cmd isn't completed until one new block request is coming from ublk block device. Add cancelable uring_cmd to provide mechanism to driver for cancelling pending commands in its own way. Add API of io_uring_cmd_mark_cancelable() for driver to mark one command as cancelable, then io_uring will cancel this command in io_uring_cancel_generic(). ->uring_cmd() callback is reused for canceling command in driver's way, then driver gets notified with the cancelling from io_uring. Add API of io_uring_cmd_get_task() to help driver cancel handler deal with the canceling.This looks better, a few comments:quoted
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h b/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h index 8e61f8b7c2ce..29a7a7e71f57 100644 --- a/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h +++ b/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h@@ -249,10 +249,13 @@ enum io_uring_op { * sqe->uring_cmd_flags * IORING_URING_CMD_FIXED use registered buffer; pass this flag * along with setting sqe->buf_index. + * IORING_URING_CANCELABLE not for userspace * IORING_URING_CMD_POLLED driver use only */ -#define IORING_URING_CMD_FIXED (1U << 0) -#define IORING_URING_CMD_POLLED (1U << 31) +#define IORING_URING_CMD_FIXED (1U << 0) +/* set by driver, and handled by io_uring to cancel this cmd */ +#define IORING_URING_CMD_CANCELABLE (1U << 30) +#define IORING_URING_CMD_POLLED (1U << 31)If IORING_URING_CANCELABLE isn't UAPI, why stuff it in here? Should we have a split where we retain the upper 8 bits for internal use, or something like that?
Yeah, it is for internal use, same with IORING_URING_CMD_POLLED. I think we can retain upper 8 bits for internal use, and move the two definitions into kernel header.
quoted
diff --git a/io_uring/io_uring.c b/io_uring/io_uring.c index 783ed0fff71b..a3135fd47a4e 100644 --- a/io_uring/io_uring.c +++ b/io_uring/io_uring.c@@ -3256,6 +3256,40 @@ static __cold bool io_uring_try_cancel_iowq(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx) return ret; } +static bool io_uring_try_cancel_uring_cmd(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, + struct task_struct *task, bool cancel_all) +{ + struct hlist_node *tmp; + struct io_kiocb *req; + bool ret = false; + + mutex_lock(&ctx->uring_lock); + hlist_for_each_entry_safe(req, tmp, &ctx->cancelable_uring_cmd, + hash_node) { + struct io_uring_cmd *cmd = io_kiocb_to_cmd(req, + struct io_uring_cmd); + struct file *file = req->file; + + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!file->f_op->uring_cmd)) + continue; + + if (!cancel_all && req->task != task) + continue; + + if (cmd->flags & IORING_URING_CMD_CANCELABLE) { + /* ->sqe isn't available if no async data */ + if (!req_has_async_data(req)) + cmd->sqe = NULL; + file->f_op->uring_cmd(cmd, IO_URING_F_CANCEL); + ret = true; + } + } + io_submit_flush_completions(ctx); + mutex_unlock(&ctx->uring_lock); + + return ret; +}I think it'd be saner to drop uring_lock here, and then:quoted
@@ -3307,6 +3341,7 @@ static __cold bool io_uring_try_cancel_requests(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, ret |= io_kill_timeouts(ctx, task, cancel_all); if (task) ret |= io_run_task_work() > 0; + ret |= io_uring_try_cancel_uring_cmd(ctx, task, cancel_all); return ret; }move this hunk into the uring_lock section. Also ensure that we do run task_work for cancelation, should the uring_cmd side require that (either now or eventually).
OK, io_run_task_work() has run task_work already.
quoted
diff --git a/io_uring/uring_cmd.c b/io_uring/uring_cmd.c index 537795fddc87..d6b200a0be33 100644 --- a/io_uring/uring_cmd.c +++ b/io_uring/uring_cmd.c@@ -13,6 +13,52 @@ #include "rsrc.h" #include "uring_cmd.h" +static void io_uring_cmd_del_cancelable(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd, + unsigned int issue_flags) +{ + if (cmd->flags & IORING_URING_CMD_CANCELABLE) { + struct io_kiocb *req = cmd_to_io_kiocb(cmd); + struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx; + + io_ring_submit_lock(ctx, issue_flags); + cmd->flags &= ~IORING_URING_CMD_CANCELABLE; + hlist_del(&req->hash_node); + io_ring_submit_unlock(ctx, issue_flags); + } +}static void io_uring_cmd_del_cancelable(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd, unsigned int issue_flags) { struct io_kiocb *req = cmd_to_io_kiocb(cmd); struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx; if (!(cmd->flags & IORING_URING_CMD_CANCELABLE)) return; io_ring_submit_lock(ctx, issue_flags); cmd->flags &= ~IORING_URING_CMD_CANCELABLE; hlist_del(&req->hash_node); io_ring_submit_unlock(ctx, issue_flags); } is cleaner imho. Minor nit.quoted
+ +/* + * Mark this command as concelable, then io_uring_try_cancel_uring_cmd() + * will try to cancel this issued command by sending ->uring_cmd() with + * issue_flags of IO_URING_F_CANCEL. + * + * The command is guaranteed to not be done when calling ->uring_cmd() + * with IO_URING_F_CANCEL, but it is driver's responsibility to deal + * with race between io_uring canceling and normal completion. + */ +int io_uring_cmd_mark_cancelable(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd, + unsigned int issue_flags) +{ + struct io_kiocb *req = cmd_to_io_kiocb(cmd); + struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx; + + io_ring_submit_lock(ctx, issue_flags); + if (!(cmd->flags & IORING_URING_CMD_CANCELABLE)) { + cmd->flags |= IORING_URING_CMD_CANCELABLE; + hlist_add_head(&req->hash_node, &ctx->cancelable_uring_cmd); + } + io_ring_submit_unlock(ctx, issue_flags); + + return 0; +}A bit inconsistent here in terms of the locking. I'm assuming the marking happens within issue, in which case it should be fine to do: int io_uring_cmd_mark_cancelable(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd, unsigned int issue_flags) { struct io_kiocb *req = cmd_to_io_kiocb(cmd); struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx; if (!(cmd->flags & IORING_URING_CMD_CANCELABLE)) { cmd->flags |= IORING_URING_CMD_CANCELABLE; io_ring_submit_lock(ctx, issue_flags); hlist_add_head(&req->hash_node, &ctx->cancelable_uring_cmd); io_ring_submit_unlock(ctx, issue_flags); }
OK, mask & clear bit can be moved out of lock in both two functions. Thanks, Ming