Re: [PATCH 5/5] block: switch ldm partition code to use pr_xxx() functions

[PATCH 0/5] Some minor cleanups · Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org> · 2023-08-08
[PATCH 5/5] block: switch ldm partition code to use pr_xxx() functions · Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org> · 2023-08-08
Re: [PATCH 5/5] block: switch ldm partition code to use pr_xxx() functions · Chaitanya Kulkarni <hidden> · 2023-08-09
Re: [PATCH 5/5] block: switch ldm partition code to use pr_xxx() functions · Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> · 2023-08-09
Re: [PATCH 5/5] block: switch ldm partition code to use pr_xxx() functions · Johannes Thumshirn <hidden> · 2023-08-15
Re: [PATCH 5/5] block: switch ldm partition code to use pr_xxx() functions · Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org> · 2023-08-15
[PATCH 3/5] block: use pr_xxx() instead of printk() in partition code · Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org> · 2023-08-08
Re: [PATCH 3/5] block: use pr_xxx() instead of printk() in partition code · Chaitanya Kulkarni <hidden> · 2023-08-09
Re: [PATCH 3/5] block: use pr_xxx() instead of printk() in partition code · Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org> · 2023-08-09
Re: [PATCH 3/5] block: use pr_xxx() instead of printk() in partition code · Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> · 2023-08-09
Re: [PATCH 3/5] block: use pr_xxx() instead of printk() in partition code · Johannes Thumshirn <hidden> · 2023-08-15
[PATCH 1/5] block: use PAGE_SECTORS_SHIFT to set limits · Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org> · 2023-08-08
Re: [PATCH 1/5] block: use PAGE_SECTORS_SHIFT to set limits · Chaitanya Kulkarni <hidden> · 2023-08-09
Re: [PATCH 1/5] block: use PAGE_SECTORS_SHIFT to set limits · Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> · 2023-08-09
Re: [PATCH 1/5] block: use PAGE_SECTORS_SHIFT to set limits · Johannes Thumshirn <hidden> · 2023-08-15
[PATCH 2/5] block: use pr_xxx() instead of printk() · Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org> · 2023-08-08
Re: [PATCH 2/5] block: use pr_xxx() instead of printk() · Chaitanya Kulkarni <hidden> · 2023-08-09
Re: [PATCH 2/5] block: use pr_xxx() instead of printk() · Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> · 2023-08-09
Re: [PATCH 2/5] block: use pr_xxx() instead of printk() · Johannes Thumshirn <hidden> · 2023-08-15
[PATCH 4/5] block: Improve efi partition debug messages · Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org> · 2023-08-08
Re: [PATCH 4/5] block: Improve efi partition debug messages · Chaitanya Kulkarni <hidden> · 2023-08-09
Re: [PATCH 4/5] block: Improve efi partition debug messages · Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> · 2023-08-09
Re: [PATCH 4/5] block: Improve efi partition debug messages · Johannes Thumshirn <hidden> · 2023-08-15

From: Johannes Thumshirn <hidden>
Date: 2023-08-15 10:07:10

On 08.08.23 19:56, Damien Le Moal wrote:

+#define ldm_debug(f, a...) pr_debug("%s(): " f, __func__, ##a) +#define 
ldm_crit(f, a...) pr_crit("%s(): " f, __func__, ##a) +#define 
ldm_error(f, a...) pr_err("%s(): " f, __func__, ##a) +#define 
ldm_info(f, a...) pr_info("%s(): " f, __func__, ##a)

Is there any value in keeping these ldm_XXX() macros around, other than 
printing the function name?

I'd just get rid of them as well and replace with the according pr_XXX() 
calls.

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help