Thread (39 messages) 39 messages, 10 authors, 2023-11-08

Re: [PATCH 1/6] block: Add config option to not allow writing to mounted devices

From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Date: 2023-08-14 16:44:10
Also in: linux-btrfs, linux-fsdevel, linux-xfs

On Tue 04-07-23 11:56:44, Colin Walters wrote:
On Tue, Jul 4, 2023, at 8:56 AM, Jan Kara wrote:
quoted
Writing to mounted devices is dangerous and can lead to filesystem
corruption as well as crashes. Furthermore syzbot comes with more and
more involved examples how to corrupt block device under a mounted
filesystem leading to kernel crashes and reports we can do nothing
about. Add tracking of writers to each block device and a kernel cmdline
argument which controls whether writes to block devices open with
BLK_OPEN_BLOCK_WRITES flag are allowed. We will make filesystems use
this flag for used devices.

Syzbot can use this cmdline argument option to avoid uninteresting
crashes. Also users whose userspace setup does not need writing to
mounted block devices can set this option for hardening.

Link: 
https://lore.kernel.org/all/60788e5d-5c7c-1142-e554-c21d709acfd9@linaro.org (local)
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
---
 block/Kconfig             | 16 ++++++++++
 block/bdev.c              | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 include/linux/blk_types.h |  1 +
 include/linux/blkdev.h    |  3 ++
 4 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/block/Kconfig b/block/Kconfig
index 86122e459fe0..8b4fa105b854 100644
--- a/block/Kconfig
+++ b/block/Kconfig
@@ -77,6 +77,22 @@ config BLK_DEV_INTEGRITY_T10
 	select CRC_T10DIF
 	select CRC64_ROCKSOFT

+config BLK_DEV_WRITE_MOUNTED
+	bool "Allow writing to mounted block devices"
+	default y
+	help
+	When a block device is mounted, writing to its buffer cache very likely
s/very/is very/
quoted
+	going to cause filesystem corruption. It is also rather easy to crash
+	the kernel in this way since the filesystem has no practical way of
+	detecting these writes to buffer cache and verifying its metadata
+	integrity. However there are some setups that need this capability
+	like running fsck on read-only mounted root device, modifying some
+	features on mounted ext4 filesystem, and similar. If you say N, the
+	kernel will prevent processes from writing to block devices that are
+	mounted by filesystems which provides some more protection from runaway
+	priviledged processes. If in doubt, say Y. The configuration can be
s/priviledged/privileged/
quoted
+	overridden with bdev_allow_write_mounted boot option.
s/with/with the/
Thanks for the language fixes!
quoted
+/* open is exclusive wrt all other BLK_OPEN_WRITE opens to the device */
+#define BLK_OPEN_BLOCK_WRITES	((__force blk_mode_t)(1 << 5))
Bikeshed but: I think BLK and BLOCK "stutter" here.  The doc comment
already uses the term "exclusive" so how about BLK_OPEN_EXCLUSIVE ?  
Well, we already have exclusive opens of block devices which are different
(they are exclusive only wrt other exclusive opens) so BLK_OPEN_EXCLUSIVE
will be really confusing. But BLK_OPEN_RESTRICT_WRITES sounds good to me.

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara [off-list ref]
SUSE Labs, CR
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help