Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] blk-flush: flush_rq should inherit first_rq's cmd_flags
From: Chengming Zhou <chengming.zhou@linux.dev>
Date: 2023-07-31 14:07:06
Also in:
lkml
On 2023/7/31 14:09, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 09:00:59PM +0800, chengming.zhou@linux.dev wrote:quoted
From: Chengming Zhou <redacted> The cmd_flags in blk_kick_flush() should inherit the original request's cmd_flags, but the current code looks buggy to me:Should it? I know the code is kinda trying to do it, but does it really make sense? Adding Hannes who originally added this inheritance and discussing the details below:
I'm not sure, actually I don't get what the current code is doing... Hope Hannes could provide some details. blk_flush_complete_seq(rq) -> blk_kick_flush(rq->cmd_flags) flush_rq will use the cmd_flags of request which just complete a sequence, there are three cases: 1. blk_insert_flush(rq): rq is pending, wait for flush 2. flush_end_io(flush_rq): rq flush seq done 3. mq_flush_data_end_io(rq): rq data seq done Only in the 1st case, the rq is the pending request that wait for flush_rq. In the 2nd and 3rd cases, the rq has nothing to do with the next flush_rq? So it's more reasonable for flush_rq to use its pending first_rq's cmd_flags?
quoted
flush_rq->cmd_flags = REQ_OP_FLUSH | REQ_PREFLUSH; - flush_rq->cmd_flags |= (flags & REQ_DRV) | (flags & REQ_FAILFAST_MASK); + flush_rq->cmd_flags |= (first_rq->cmd_flags & REQ_DRV) | + (first_rq->cmd_flags & REQ_FAILFAST_MASK);Two cases here: 1) REQ_FAILFAST_MASK: I don't think this is actually set on flush request currently, and even if it was applying it to the flush that serves more than a single originating command seems wrong to me. 2) REQ_DRV is only set by drivers that have seen a bio. For dm this is used as REQ_DM_POLL_LIST which should never be set for a flush/fua request. For nvme-mpath it is REQ_NVME_MPATH, which is set in the bio based driver and used for decision making in the I/O completion handler. So I guess this one actually does need to get passed through.
The commit 84fca1b0c461 ("block: pass failfast and driver-specific flags to
flush requests") says:
If flush requests are being sent to the device we need to inherit the
failfast and driver-specific flags, too, otherwise I/O will fail.
1) REQ_FAILFAST_MASK: agree, shouldn't set to the flush_rq I think?
2) REQ_DRV: I don't get why this flag not set would cause I/O fail?
Thanks!