Thread (56 messages) 56 messages, 7 authors, 2023-05-15

Re: [PATCH v6 4/5] dm-thin: Add REQ_OP_PROVISION support

From: Sarthak Kukreti <hidden>
Date: 2023-05-15 21:19:37
Also in: dm-devel, linux-ext4, linux-fsdevel, lkml

On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 10:32 AM Mike Snitzer [off-list ref] wrote:
On Sat, May 06 2023 at  2:29P -0400,
Sarthak Kukreti [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
dm-thinpool uses the provision request to provision
blocks for a dm-thin device. dm-thinpool currently does not
pass through REQ_OP_PROVISION to underlying devices.

For shared blocks, provision requests will break sharing and copy the
contents of the entire block. Additionally, if 'skip_block_zeroing'
is not set, dm-thin will opt to zero out the entire range as a part
of provisioning.

Signed-off-by: Sarthak Kukreti <redacted>
---
 drivers/md/dm-thin.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-thin.c b/drivers/md/dm-thin.c
index 2b13c949bd72..3f94f53ac956 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm-thin.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-thin.c
...
quoted
@@ -4114,6 +4171,8 @@ static void pool_io_hints(struct dm_target *ti, struct queue_limits *limits)
       * The pool uses the same discard limits as the underlying data
       * device.  DM core has already set this up.
       */
+
+     limits->max_provision_sectors = pool->sectors_per_block;
Just noticed that setting limits->max_provision_sectors needs to move
above pool_io_hints code that sets up discards -- otherwise the early
return from if (!pt->adjusted_pf.discard_enabled) will cause setting
max_provision_sectors to be skipped.

Here is a roll up of the fixes that need to be folded into this patch:
Ah right, thanks for pointing that out! I'll fold this into v7.

Best
Sarthak
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-thin.c b/drivers/md/dm-thin.c
index 3f94f53ac956..90c8e36cb327 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm-thin.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-thin.c
@@ -4151,6 +4151,8 @@ static void pool_io_hints(struct dm_target *ti, struct queue_limits *limits)
                blk_limits_io_opt(limits, pool->sectors_per_block << SECTOR_SHIFT);
        }

+       limits->max_provision_sectors = pool->sectors_per_block;
+
        /*
         * pt->adjusted_pf is a staging area for the actual features to use.
         * They get transferred to the live pool in bind_control_target()
@@ -4171,8 +4173,6 @@ static void pool_io_hints(struct dm_target *ti, struct queue_limits *limits)
         * The pool uses the same discard limits as the underlying data
         * device.  DM core has already set this up.
         */
-
-       limits->max_provision_sectors = pool->sectors_per_block;
 }

 static struct target_type pool_target = {
@@ -4349,6 +4349,7 @@ static int thin_ctr(struct dm_target *ti, unsigned int argc, char **argv)

        ti->num_provision_bios = 1;
        ti->provision_supported = true;
+       ti->max_provision_granularity = true;

        mutex_unlock(&dm_thin_pool_table.mutex);
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help