On 2022/6/27 11:57, Shinichiro Kawasaki wrote:

It's the better to keep _have_kernel_option() isn't it?  It will make this patch
smaller since many of existing _have_kernel_option() calls can be left as is.
_have_kernel_option() can be rewritten to call _have_kernel_config_file() and
_check_kernel_option(). To distinguish usages of _have_kernel_option() and
_check_kernel_option(), short comments on those functions will be helpful.

Sure. I will keep _have_kernel_option() in my v2 patch.

Best Regards,
Xiao Yang