Thread (18 messages) 18 messages, 7 authors, 2022-01-28
STALE1614d

[PATCH 8/9] block/bfq-iosched.c: use "false" rather than "BLK_RW_ASYNC"

From: NeilBrown <hidden>
Date: 2022-01-27 02:49:31
Also in: ceph-devel, linux-ext4, linux-f2fs-devel, linux-fsdevel, linux-mm, linux-nfs, lkml
Subsystem: bfq i/o scheduler, block layer, the rest · Maintainers: Yu Kuai, Jens Axboe, Linus Torvalds

bfq_get_queue() expects a "bool" for the third arg, so pass "false"
rather than "BLK_RW_ASYNC" which will soon be removed.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <redacted>
---
 block/bfq-iosched.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c
index 0c612a911696..4e645ae1e066 100644
--- a/block/bfq-iosched.c
+++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c
@@ -5448,7 +5448,7 @@ static void bfq_check_ioprio_change(struct bfq_io_cq *bic, struct bio *bio)
 	bfqq = bic_to_bfqq(bic, false);
 	if (bfqq) {
 		bfq_release_process_ref(bfqd, bfqq);
-		bfqq = bfq_get_queue(bfqd, bio, BLK_RW_ASYNC, bic, true);
+		bfqq = bfq_get_queue(bfqd, bio, false, bic, true);
 		bic_set_bfqq(bic, bfqq, false);
 	}
 

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help