Re: sorting out the freeze / quiesce mess
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Date: 2021-11-10 12:59:01
Also in:
linux-nvme, linux-scsi
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Date: 2021-11-10 12:59:01
Also in:
linux-nvme, linux-scsi
On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 05:29:26PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 10:14:07AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:quoted
Hi Jens and Ming, I've been looking into properly supporting queue freezing for bio based drivers (that is only release q_usage_counter on bio completion for them). And the deeper I look into the code the more I'm confused by us having the blk_mq_quiesce* interface in addition to blk_freeze_queue. What is a good reason to do a quiesce separately from a freeze?freeze can make sure that all requests are done, quiesce can make sure that dispatch critical area(covered by hctx lock/unlock) is done.
Yeah, but why do we need to still call quiesce after we just did a freeze, which is about half of the users?