Re: [PATCH v9 3/5] libata: support concurrent positioning ranges log
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Date: 2021-11-02 14:02:22
Also in:
linux-ide, linux-scsi
Hi Damien, On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 12:42 PM Damien Le Moal [off-list ref] wrote:
On 2021/11/02 19:40, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:quoted
On Wed, 27 Oct 2021, Damien Le Moal wrote:quoted
Add support to discover if an ATA device supports the Concurrent Positioning Ranges data log (address 0x47), indicating that the device is capable of seeking to multiple different locations in parallel using multiple actuators serving different LBA ranges. Also add support to translate the concurrent positioning ranges log into its equivalent Concurrent Positioning Ranges VPD page B9h in libata-scsi.c. The format of the Concurrent Positioning Ranges Log is defined in ACS-5 r9. Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <redacted>Thanks for your patch, which is now commit fe22e1c2f705676a ("libata: support concurrent positioning ranges log") upstream. During resume from s2ram on Renesas Salvator-XS, I now see more scary messages than before: ata1: link resume succeeded after 1 retries ata1: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 300) +ata1.00: qc timeout (cmd 0x2f) +ata1.00: Read log page 0x00 failed, Emask 0x4 +ata1.00: ATA Identify Device Log not supported +ata1.00: failed to set xfermode (err_mask=0x40) ata1: link resume succeeded after 1 retries ata1: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 300) +ata1.00: ATA Identify Device Log not supported +ata1.00: ATA Identify Device Log not supported ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133 I guess this is expected?Nope, it is not. The problem is actually not the concurrent positioning log, or any other log, being supported or not. Notice the qc timeout ? On device scan after coming out of sleep, or even simply doing a rmmod ahci+modprobe ahci, the read log commands issued during device revalidate timeout fairly easily as they are issued while the drive is not necessarilly fully restarted yet. These errors happen fairly easily due to the command timeout setting in libata being too short, I think, for the "restart" case. On a clean boot, they do not happen as longer timeouts are used in that case. I identified this problem recently while testing stuff: I was doing rmmod of ata modules and then modprobe of newly compiled modules for tests and noticed these timeouts. Increasing the timeout values, they disappear. I am however still scratching my head about the best way to address this. Still digging about this to first make sure this is really about timeouts being set too short.
There's indeed something timing-related going on. Sometimes I get
during resume (s2idle or s2ram):
ata1.00: qc timeout (cmd 0x2f)
ata1.00: Read log page 0x00 failed, Emask 0x4
ata1.00: ATA Identify Device Log not supported
ata1.00: failed to set xfermode (err_mask=0x40)
ata1.00: limiting speed to UDMA/133:PIO3
ata1: link resume succeeded after 1 retries
ata1: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 300)
ata1.00: NODEV after polling detection
ata1.00: revalidation failed (errno=-2)
ata1.00: disabled
ata1: link resume succeeded after 1 retries
ata1: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 300)
sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Start/Stop Unit failed: Result: hostbyte=0x04
driverbyte=DRIVER_OK
sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Read Capacity(16) failed: Result: hostbyte=0x04
driverbyte=DRIVER_OK
sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Sense not available.
sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Read Capacity(10) failed: Result: hostbyte=0x04
driverbyte=DRIVER_OK
sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Sense not available.
sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] 0 512-byte logical blocks: (0 B/0 B)
sda: detected capacity change from 320173056 to 0
after which the drive is no longer functional...
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds