On Tue 2021-10-26 23:37:30, Ming Lei wrote:

On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 10:48:18AM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:

quoted

Below are more details about the livepatch code. I hope that it will
help you to see if zram has similar problems or not.

We have kobject in three structures: klp_func, klp_object, and
klp_patch, see include/linux/livepatch.h.

These structures have to be statically defined in the module sources
because they define what is livepatched, see
samples/livepatch/livepatch-sample.c

The kobject is used there to show information about the patch, patched
objects, and patched functions, in sysfs. And most importantly,
the sysfs interface can be used to disable the livepatch.

The problem with static structures is that the module must stay
in the memory as long as the sysfs interface exists. It can be
solved in module_exit() callback. It could wait until the sysfs
interface is destroyed.

kobject API does not support this scenario. The relase() callbacks

kobject_delete() is for supporting this scenario, that is why we don't
need to grab module refcnt before calling show()/store() of the
kobject's attributes.

kobject_delete() can be called in module_exit(), then any show()/store()
will be done after kobject_delete() returns.

I am a bit confused. I do not see kobject_delete() anywhere in kernel
sources.

I see only kobject_del() and kobject_put(). AFAIK, they do _not_
guarantee that either the sysfs interface was destroyed or
the release callbacks were called. For example, see
schedule_delayed_work(&kobj->release, delay) in kobject_release().

By other words, anyone could still be using either the sysfs interface
or the related structures after kobject_del() or kobject_put()
returns.

IMHO, kobject API does not support static structures and module
removal.

Best Regards,
Petr