Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] blk-mq: don't call callbacks for requests that bypassed the scheduler
From: Niklas Cassel <hidden>
Date: 2021-09-07 12:59:37
Also in:
lkml
On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 06:11:12PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 09:48:06AM +0000, Niklas Cassel wrote:quoted
On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 09:28:07PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:quoted
On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 12:41:31PM +0000, Niklas Cassel wrote:quoted
From: Niklas Cassel <redacted> Currently, __blk_mq_alloc_request() calls ops.prepare_request and sets RQF_ELVPRIV. Therefore, (if the request is not a flush) the RQF_ELVPRIV flag will be set for the request in blk_mq_submit_bio(), regardless if the request was submitted to a scheduler, or bypassed the scheduler. Later, blk_mq_free_request() checks if the RQF_ELVPRIV flag is set, if it is, the ops.finish_request callback will be called. The problem with this is that the finish_request scheduler callback will be called for requests that bypassed the scheduler. Fix this by calling the scheduler ops.prepare_request callback, and set the RQF_ELVPRIV flag only immediately before calling the insert callback.One request could be inserted more than one times, such as requeue, however __blk_mq_alloc_request() is just run once, so is it fine to call ->prepare_request more than one time for same request?Calling ->prepare_request multiple times is fine. All the different I/O schedulers (BFQ, mq-deadline, kyber) simply use .prepare_request to clear/set elv->priv to a fixed value.quoted
Or I am wondering why not call ->prepare_request when the following check is true? if (e && e->type->ops.prepare_request && !op_is_flush(data->cmd_flags) && !blk_op_is_passthrough(data->cmd_flags)) e->type->ops.prepare_request()That might work, and might be a nicer solution indeed. If a request got plugged, it will be inserted to the scheduler through blk_flush_plug_list() -> blk_mq_flush_plug_list() -> blk_mq_sched_insert_requests() which will insert them unconditionally. In this case. we know that !op_is_flush() (because if it was, blk_mq_submit_bio() would have inserted directly.) If we didn't plug, we do blk_mq_sched_insert_request(), which will add it if blk_mq_sched_bypass_insert() returns false: blk_mq_sched_bypass_insert() is defined as: if ((rq->rq_flags & RQF_FLUSH_SEQ) || blk_rq_is_passthrough(rq)) return true; Also in this case. we know that !op_is_flush() (blk_mq_submit_bio() would have inserted directly.) So, we could easily add && !blk_op_is_passthrough(data->cmd_flags) to the ->prepare_request condition in blk_mq_rq_ctx_init() like you suggested, but since the bypass condition also seems to look at RQF_FLUSH_SEQ, wouldn't we need to add RQF_FLUSH_SEQ to the condition in blk_mq_rq_ctx_init() as well? This flag is set after blk_mq_rq_ctx_init(). Are we sure that RQF_FLUSH_SEQ flag will only be set for a request which op_is_flush() returned true? (If so, then only adding && !blk_op_is_passthrough(data->cmd_flags) should be fine.)BTW, what I meant is the following change, is it fine?diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c index 0a33d16a7298..f98f8cc05644 100644 --- a/block/blk-mq.c +++ b/block/blk-mq.c@@ -327,20 +327,6 @@ static struct request *blk_mq_rq_ctx_init(struct blk_mq_alloc_data *data, data->ctx->rq_dispatched[op_is_sync(data->cmd_flags)]++; refcount_set(&rq->ref, 1); - - if (!op_is_flush(data->cmd_flags)) { - struct elevator_queue *e = data->q->elevator; - - rq->elv.icq = NULL; - if (e && e->type->ops.prepare_request) { - if (e->type->icq_cache) - blk_mq_sched_assign_ioc(rq); - - e->type->ops.prepare_request(rq); - rq->rq_flags |= RQF_ELVPRIV; - } - } - data->hctx->queued++; return rq; }@@ -359,17 +345,25 @@ static struct request *__blk_mq_alloc_request(struct blk_mq_alloc_data *data) if (data->cmd_flags & REQ_NOWAIT) data->flags |= BLK_MQ_REQ_NOWAIT; - if (e) { + if (e && !op_is_flush(data->cmd_flags) && + !blk_op_is_passthrough(data->cmd_flags)) { /* * Flush/passthrough requests are special and go directly to the * dispatch list. Don't include reserved tags in the * limiting, as it isn't useful. */ - if (!op_is_flush(data->cmd_flags) && - !blk_op_is_passthrough(data->cmd_flags) && - e->type->ops.limit_depth && - !(data->flags & BLK_MQ_REQ_RESERVED)) + if (e->type->ops.limit_depth && + !(data->flags & BLK_MQ_REQ_RESERVED)) e->type->ops.limit_depth(data->cmd_flags, data); + + rq->elv.icq = NULL; + if (e->type->ops.prepare_request) { + if (e->type->icq_cache) + blk_mq_sched_assign_ioc(rq); + + e->type->ops.prepare_request(rq); + rq->rq_flags |= RQF_ELVPRIV; + } } retry:
Hello Ming, Sorry for the delayed reply. Your patch does not compile, because rq is not defined in this function. Another problem seems to be that in __blk_mq_alloc_request(), at the end of the function, calls blk_mq_rq_ctx_init(), which will unconditionally set rq->rq_flags = 0; The simple patch:
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c@@ -328,7 +328,8 @@ static struct request *blk_mq_rq_ctx_init(struct blk_mq_alloc_data *data, data->ctx->rq_dispatched[op_is_sync(data->cmd_flags)]++; refcount_set(&rq->ref, 1); - if (!op_is_flush(data->cmd_flags)) { + if (!op_is_flush(data->cmd_flags) && + !blk_op_is_passthrough(data->cmd_flags)) { struct elevator_queue *e = data->q->elevator; rq->elv.icq = NULL;
Does appear to solve the problem. My only worry was RQF_FLUSH_SEQ flag, but as far as I can tell, it is only ever set for a request that which op_is_flush() returned true. Kind regards, Niklas