Re: [RFC PATCH 1/5] checkpatch: improve handling of revert commits
From: Denis Efremov <efremov@linux.com>
Date: 2021-08-21 07:35:22
Also in:
linux-kselftest, lkml
From: Denis Efremov <efremov@linux.com>
Date: 2021-08-21 07:35:22
Also in:
linux-kselftest, lkml
On 8/21/21 10:12 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
On Sat, 2021-08-21 at 09:47 +0300, Denis Efremov wrote:quoted
On 8/20/21 1:17 AM, Joe Perches wrote:quoted
And I'm not sure if this particular ERROR is that useful overall.I find it useful to check commit-id and that it matches a title. It's easy to make a typo in commit-id and get an invalid one.That's true, but I meant requiring the sha1 hash to contain both the word "commit" and use ("title"). Looking at checkpatch's errors produced by this GIT_COMMIT_ID test makes the required form seem a bit too inflexible to me. For instance: a sha1 hash may be repeated in a commit message where the first instance has the correct form but the second use is just the hash and the warning is still produced.
I agree with you. There is also another example with list of commits:
- commit <id-1> ("Title1")
- commit <id-2> ("Title2")
...
I see no reason in writing "commit" on each line.