On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 11:06:27PM +0800, John Garry wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
The original code in commit 24d2f90309b23 ("blk-mq: split out tag
initialization, support shared tags") would check tags->rqs is non-NULL and
then dereference tags->rqs[].
Then in commit 2af8cbe30531 ("blk-mq: split tag ->rqs[] into two"), we
started to dereference tags->static_rqs[], but continued to check non-NULL
tags->rqs.
Check tags->static_rqs as non-NULL instead, which is more logical.
Signed-off-by: John Garry <redacted>
---
block/blk-mq.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index 2c4ac51e54eb..ae28f470893c 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -2348,7 +2348,7 @@ void blk_mq_free_rqs(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set, struct blk_mq_tags *tags,
{
struct page *page;
- if (tags->rqs && set->ops->exit_request) {
+ if (tags->static_rqs && set->ops->exit_request) {
Yeah, it is reasonable to check ->static_rqs since both ->init_request()
and ->exit_request() operate on request from ->static_rqs[]:
Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <redacted>
--
Ming