Thread (10 messages) flat view 10 messages, 7 authors, 2021-06-13

Re: [LSF/MM/BPF TOPIC] durability vs performance for flash devices (especially embedded!)

From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Date: 2021-06-09 18:47:35
Also in: linux-fsdevel

On 6/9/21 11:30 AM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
maybe you should read the paper.

" Thiscomparison demonstrates that using F2FS, a flash-friendly file
sys-tem, does not mitigate the wear-out problem, except inasmuch asit
inadvertently rate limitsallI/O to the device"
It seems like my email was not clear enough? What I tried to make clear
is that I think that there is no way to solve the flash wear issue with
the traditional block interface. I think that F2FS in combination with
the zone interface is an effective solution.

What is also relevant in this context is that the "Flash drive lifespan
is a problem" paper was published in 2017. I think that the first
commercial SSDs with a zone interface became available at a later time
(summer of 2020?).

Bart.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help