Thread (18 messages) 18 messages, 5 authors, 2021-05-07

Re: [PATCH] block: reexpand iov_iter after read/write

From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Date: 2021-05-06 17:17:48
Also in: io-uring, linux-fsdevel

On Thu, May 06, 2021 at 05:57:02PM +0100, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
On 4/30/21 3:35 PM, Al Viro wrote:
quoted
On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 01:57:22PM +0100, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
quoted
On 4/28/21 7:16 AM, yangerkun wrote:
quoted
Hi,

Should we pick this patch for 5.13?
Looks ok to me
	Looks sane.  BTW, Pavel, could you go over #untested.iov_iter
and give it some beating?  Ideally - with per-commit profiling to see
what speedups/slowdowns do they come with...
I've heard Jens already tested it out. Jens, is that right? Can you
share? especially since you have much more fitting hardware.
FWIW, the current branch is #untested.iov_iter-3 and the code generated
by it at least _looks_ better than with mainline; how much of an improvement
does it make would have to be found by profiling...
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help