Thread (8 messages) 8 messages, 2 authors, 2021-04-30

Re: [dm-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 2/2] dm: add CONFIG_DM_MULTIPATH_SG_IO - failover for SG_IO on dm-multipath

From: Martin Wilck <hidden>
Date: 2021-04-29 21:08:27
Also in: dm-devel

On Thu, 2021-04-29 at 09:32 -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On 4/29/21 8:50 AM, mwilck@suse.com wrote:
quoted
+       if (hdr.dxfer_len > (queue_max_hw_sectors(bdev->bd_disk-
quoted
queue) << 9))
+               return -EIO;
How about using SECTOR_SHIFT instead of the number 9?
no problem. That line was just copied from the scsi_ioctl code.
quoted
+               /*
+                * Errors resulting from invalid parameters
shouldn't be retried
+                * on another path.
+                */
+               switch (rc) {
+               case -ENOIOCTLCMD:
+               case -EFAULT:
+               case -EINVAL:
+               case -EPERM:
+                       goto out;
+               default:
+                       break;
+               }
Will -ENOMEM result in an immediate retry? Is that what's desired?
No, I overlooked that case. Thanks for pointing this out. 
quoted
+               if (rhdr.info & SG_INFO_CHECK) {
+                       int result;
+                       blk_status_t sts;
+
+                       __set_status_byte(&result, rhdr.status);
+                       __set_msg_byte(&result, rhdr.msg_status);
+                       __set_host_byte(&result, rhdr.host_status);
+                       __set_driver_byte(&result,
rhdr.driver_status);
+
+                       sts = __scsi_result_to_blk_status(&result,
result);
+                       rhdr.host_status = host_byte(result);
+
+                       /* See if this is a target or path error.
*/
+                       if (sts == BLK_STS_OK)
+                               rc = 0;
+                       else if (blk_path_error(sts))
+                               rc = -EIO;
+                       else {
+                               rc = blk_status_to_errno(sts);
+                               goto out;
+                       }
+               }
Will SAM_STAT_CHECK_CONDITION be treated as an I/O error? Is that
what's
desired? If not, does that mean that scsi_result_to_blk_status()
shouldn't be used but instead that a custom SCSI result conversion is
needed?
This mimics the logic for regular SCSI block I/O. By default, CHECK
CONDITION indeed maps to a BLK_STS_IO_ERR, and will be treated as a
path error. As you probably know, there are some exceptions that are
handled in the SCSI mid-layer beforehand. For example, check_sense()
sets DID_TARGET_FAILURE or DID_MEDIUM_ERROR for certain sense codes,
which map to target errors. So yes, I think this is correct.
If __scsi_result_to_blk_status() is the right function to call, how
about making that function accept the driver status, host status, msg
and SAM status as four separate arguments such that the
__set_*_byte()
calls can be left out?
quoted
+                       char *argv[2] = { "fail_path", bdbuf };
Can the above array be declared static?
How would that work? The function needs to be reentrant, and bdbuf is
on the stack. I don't see an issue here, it's really just two pointers
on the stack.

Regards,
Martin

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help