Re: bio_add_folio argument order
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Date: 2021-04-28 16:58:48
On 4/28/21 10:50 AM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
bio_add_page() has its arguments in the wrong order:
extern int bio_add_page(struct bio *, struct page *, unsigned int,unsigned int);
Oh, right, and the prototype commits the cardinal sin of just giving you
a pair of unsigned ints and doesn't bother to tell you what they mean.
I'll send a patch for that ... anyway:
int bio_add_page(struct bio *bio, struct page *page,
unsigned int len, unsigned int offset)
This fails to follow #4: https://ozlabs.org/~rusty/index.cgi/tech/2008-03-30.html
Here's what I want to do for the folio equivalent:
size_t bio_add_folio(struct bio *bio, struct folio *folio, size_t off,
size_t len)
This will make the transition more painful, but it does remove an irritant
for the future. Any objections?What's the point in shuffling len and offset around? -- Jens Axboe