Thread (99 messages) 99 messages, 6 authors, 2021-05-11

Re: [PATCH 05/16] dma-mapping: Introduce dma_map_sg_p2pdma()

From: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
Date: 2021-04-27 22:56:16
Also in: linux-iommu, linux-mm, linux-nvme, linux-pci, lkml


On 2021-04-27 1:31 p.m., Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 11:01:12AM -0600, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
quoted
+/*
+ * dma_maps_sg_attrs returns 0 on error and > 0 on success.
+ * It should never return a value < 0.
+ */
Also it is weird a function that can't return 0 is returning an int type
Yes, Christoph mentioned in the last series that this should probably
change to an unsigned but I wasn't really sure if that change should be
a part of the P2PDMA series.
quoted
+int dma_map_sg_attrs(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sg, int nents,
+		enum dma_data_direction dir, unsigned long attrs)
+{
+	int ents;
+
+	ents = __dma_map_sg_attrs(dev, sg, nents, dir, attrs);
 	BUG_ON(ents < 0);
if (WARN_ON(ents < 0))
     return 0;

instead of bug on?
It was BUG_ON in the original code. So I felt I should leave it.
Also, I see only 8 users of this function. How about just fix them all
to support negative returns and use this as the p2p API instead of
adding new API?
Well there might be 8 users of dma_map_sg_attrs() but there are a very
large number of dma_map_sg(). Seems odd to me to single out the first as
requiring these changes, but leave the latter.
Add the opposite logic flag, 'DMA_ATTRS_NO_ERROR' and pass it through
the other api entry callers that can't handle it?
I'm not that opposed to this. But it will make this series a fair bit
longer to change the 8 map_sg_attrs() usages.

Logan
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help