On 3/26/21 9:45 AM, Tom Saeger wrote:

On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 09:41:49AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:

quoted

On 3/25/21 9:04 PM, Tom Saeger wrote:

quoted

s/Additonal/Additional/
s/assocaited/associated/
s/assocaited/associated/
s/assocating/associating/
s/becasue/because/
s/configred/configured/
s/deactive/deactivate/
s/followings/following/
s/funtion/function/
s/heirarchy/hierarchy/
s/intiailized/initialized/
s/prefered/preferred/
s/readded/read/
s/Secion/Section/
s/soley/solely/

While I'm generally happy to accept any patch that makes sense, the
recent influx of speling fixes have me less than excited. They just
add complications to backports and stable patches, for example, and
I'd prefer not to take them for that reason alone.

Nod.

In that case - perhaps adding these entries to scripts/spelling.txt
would at least catch some going forward?

I can send that.

That seems like a good idea.

-- 
Jens Axboe