Thread (92 messages) 92 messages, 15 authors, 2020-11-10

Re: [PATCH RFC PKS/PMEM 22/58] fs/f2fs: Utilize new kmap_thread()

From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Date: 2020-10-12 16:45:03
Also in: amd-gfx, bpf, ceph-devel, dri-devel, intel-gfx, intel-wired-lan, io-uring, kexec, kvm, linux-bcache, linux-btrfs, linux-cifs, linux-doc, linux-efi, linux-ext4, linux-f2fs-devel, linux-fsdevel, linux-kselftest, linux-mm, linux-mmc, linux-nfs, linux-rdma, linux-scsi, linux-um, linuxppc-dev, lkml, netdev, nvdimm, target-devel, xen-devel

On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 09:28:29AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
kmap_atomic() is always preferred over kmap()/kmap_thread().
kmap_atomic() is _much_ more lightweight since its TLB invalidation is
always CPU-local and never broadcast.

So, basically, unless you *must* sleep while the mapping is in place,
kmap_atomic() is preferred.
But kmap_atomic() disables preemption, so the _ideal_ interface would map
it only locally, then on preemption make it global.  I don't even know
if that _can_ be done.  But this email makes it seem like kmap_atomic()
has no downsides.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help