Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] xen-blkback: add a parameter for disabling of persistent grants
From: SeongJae Park <hidden>
Date: 2020-09-22 11:27:09
Also in:
lkml, xen-devel
On Tue, 22 Sep 2020 13:12:59 +0200 "Roger Pau Monné" [off-list ref] wrote:
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 12:52:07PM +0200, SeongJae Park wrote:quoted
From: SeongJae Park <redacted> Persistent grants feature provides high scalability. On some small systems, however, it could incur data copy overheads[1] and thus it is required to be disabled. But, there is no option to disable it. For the reason, this commit adds a module parameter for disabling of the feature. [1] https://wiki.xen.org/wiki/Xen_4.3_Block_Protocol_Scalability Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori <redacted> Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <redacted> --- .../ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-xen-blkback | 9 ++++++ drivers/block/xen-blkback/xenbus.c | 28 ++++++++++++++----- 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-xen-blkback b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-xen-blkback index ecb7942ff146..ac2947b98950 100644 --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-xen-blkback +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-xen-blkback@@ -35,3 +35,12 @@ Description: controls the duration in milliseconds that blkback will not cache any page not backed by a grant mapping. The default is 10ms. + +What: /sys/module/xen_blkback/parameters/feature_persistent +Date: September 2020 +KernelVersion: 5.10 +Contact: SeongJae Park <sjpark@amazon.de> +Description: + Whether to enable the persistent grants feature or not. Note + that this option only takes effect on newly created backends. + The default is Y (enable).diff --git a/drivers/block/xen-blkback/xenbus.c b/drivers/block/xen-blkback/xenbus.c index b9aa5d1ac10b..8a95ddd08b13 100644 --- a/drivers/block/xen-blkback/xenbus.c +++ b/drivers/block/xen-blkback/xenbus.c@@ -879,6 +879,12 @@ static void reclaim_memory(struct xenbus_device *dev) /* ** Connection ** */ +/* Enable the persistent grants feature. */ +static bool feature_persistent = true; +module_param(feature_persistent, bool, 0644); +MODULE_PARM_DESC(feature_persistent, + "Enables the persistent grants feature"); + /* * Write the physical details regarding the block device to the store, and * switch to Connected state.@@ -906,11 +912,15 @@ static void connect(struct backend_info *be) xen_blkbk_barrier(xbt, be, be->blkif->vbd.flush_support); - err = xenbus_printf(xbt, dev->nodename, "feature-persistent", "%u", 1); - if (err) { - xenbus_dev_fatal(dev, err, "writing %s/feature-persistent", - dev->nodename); - goto abort; + if (feature_persistent) { + err = xenbus_printf(xbt, dev->nodename, "feature-persistent", + "%u", feature_persistent); + if (err) { + xenbus_dev_fatal(dev, err, + "writing %s/feature-persistent", + dev->nodename); + goto abort; + } } err = xenbus_printf(xbt, dev->nodename, "sectors", "%llu",@@ -1093,8 +1103,12 @@ static int connect_ring(struct backend_info *be) xenbus_dev_fatal(dev, err, "unknown fe protocol %s", protocol); return -ENOSYS; } - pers_grants = xenbus_read_unsigned(dev->otherend, "feature-persistent", - 0); + if (feature_persistent) + pers_grants = xenbus_read_unsigned(dev->otherend, + "feature-persistent", 0); + else + pers_grants = 0; +Sorry for not realizing earlier, but looking at it again I think you need to cache the value of feature_persistent when it's first used in the blkback state data, so that it's consistent. What would happen for example with the following flow (assume a persistent grants enabled frontend): feature_persistent = false connect(...) feature-persistent is not written to xenstore User changes feature_persistent = true connect_ring(...) pers_grants = true, because feature-persistent is set unconditionally by the frontend and feature_persistent variable is now true. Then blkback will try to use persistent grants and the whole connection will malfunction because the frontend won't.
Ah, you're right. I should also catch this before but didn't, sorry.
The other option is to prevent changing the variable when there are blkback instances already running.
I think storing the option value in xenstore would be simpler. That said, if you prefer this way, please let me know. Thanks, SeongJae Park