Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] io_uring: add support for zone-append
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Date: 2020-07-10 14:09:43
Also in:
io-uring, linux-fsdevel, lkml
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Date: 2020-07-10 14:09:43
Also in:
io-uring, linux-fsdevel, lkml
On 7/10/20 7:10 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 12:35:43AM +0530, Kanchan Joshi wrote:quoted
Append required special treatment (conversion for sector to bytes) for io_uring. And we were planning a user-space wrapper to abstract that. But good part (as it seems now) was: append result went along with cflags at virtually no additional cost. And uring code changes became super clean/minimal with further revisions. While indirect-offset requires doing allocation/mgmt in application, io-uring submission and in completion path (which seems trickier), and those CQE flags still get written user-space and serve no purpose for append-write.I have to say that storing the results in the CQE generally make so much more sense. I wonder if we need a per-fd "large CGE" flag that adds two extra u64s to the CQE, and some ops just require this version.
I have been pondering the same thing, we could make certain ops consume two CQEs if it makes sense. It's a bit ugly on the app side with two different CQEs for a request, though. We can't just treat it as a large CQE, as they might not be sequential if we happen to wrap. But maybe it's not too bad. -- Jens Axboe