Re: [PATCH v3 4/6] blktrace: fix debugfs use after free
From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Date: 2020-04-29 12:02:37
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, linux-mm, lkml
On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 04:50:51AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 11:45:42AM +0000, Luis Chamberlain wrote:quoted
On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 04:26:37AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:quoted
I can't say I'm a fan of all these long backtraces in commit logs..quoted
+static struct dentry *blk_debugfs_dir_register(const char *name) +{ + return debugfs_create_dir(name, blk_debugfs_root); +}I don't think we really need this helper.We don't export blk_debugfs_root, didn't think we'd want to, and since only a few scew funky drivers would use the struct gendisk and also support BLKTRACE, I didn't think we'd want to export it now. A new block private symbol namespace alright?Err, that function is static and has two callers.
Yes but that is to make it easier to look for who is creating the debugfs_dir for either the request_queue or partition. I'll export blk_debugfs_root and we'll open code all this.
quoted
quoted
This could be simplified down to: if (bdev && bdev != bdev->bd_contains) return bdev->bd_part->debugfs_dir; return q->debugfs_dir; Given that bd_part is in __blkdev_get very near bd_contains.Ah neat.quoted
Also given that this patch completely rewrites blk_trace_debugfs_dir is there any point in the previous patch?Still think it helps with making this patch easier to read, but I don't care, lemme know if I should just fold it.In fact I'm not even sure we need the helper. Modulo the comment this just becomes a: if (bdev && bdev != bdev->bd_contains) dir = bdev->bd_part->debugfs_dir; else dir = q->debugfs_dir; in do_blk_trace_setup.
True, alright will remove that patch. Luis