Sagi,

Sorry for the late reply, lost track of this.

No problem!

Can you try attached patch and see if it solves your issue?
WARNING: very lightly tested...

I have run our tests against this patch and it is working well for our
"basic" testing as well. The test case that previously failed, now
passes with this patch. So that's encouraging! Thanks for the quick
response and quick patch.

One question we had is regarding the hard coded header length: What
happens if the initiator sends an extended CDB, like a WRITE32? Are
there any concerns with an additional header segment (AHS)?

Thanks again,
Steve