Thread (12 messages) 12 messages, 3 authors, 2020-03-26

Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] block/diskstats: more accurate io_ticks and optimization

From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Date: 2020-03-24 16:06:33
Also in: lkml

On 3/24/20 12:39 AM, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
Simplified estimation for io_ticks introduced in patch
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/20181206164122.2166-5-snitzer@redhat.com/ (local)
could be very inaccurate for request longer than jiffy (i.e. any HDD)

There is at least one another report about this:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/20200324031942.GA3060@ming.t460p/ (local)
See detail in comment for first patch.

v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/155413438394.3201.15211440151043943989.stgit@buzz/ (local)
v2: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/158314549775.1788.6529015932237292177.stgit@buzz/ (local)
v3:
 * update documentation
 * rebase to current linux-next
 * fix compilation for CONFIG_SMP=n
Can you respin this against my for-5.7/block branch?

-- 
Jens Axboe
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help