Thread (19 messages) 19 messages, 8 authors, 2020-03-03

Re: LKFT: arm x15: mmc1: cache flush error -110

From: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Date: 2020-02-25 11:41:38
Also in: linux-mmc, lkml
Subsystem: multimedia card (mmc), secure digital (sd) and sdio subsystem, the rest · Maintainers: Ulf Hansson, Linus Torvalds

On 25/02/2020 10:04, Jon Hunter wrote:

...
quoted
quoted
  I find that from the commit the changes in mmc_flush_cache below is
the cause.

##
@@ -961,7 +963,8 @@ int mmc_flush_cache(struct mmc_card *card)
                         (card->ext_csd.cache_size > 0) &&
                         (card->ext_csd.cache_ctrl & 1)) {
                 err = mmc_switch(card, EXT_CSD_CMD_SET_NORMAL,
-                               EXT_CSD_FLUSH_CACHE, 1, 0);
+                                EXT_CSD_FLUSH_CACHE, 1,
+                                MMC_CACHE_FLUSH_TIMEOUT_MS);

I no longer see the issue on reverting the above hunk as Bitan suggested
but now I see the following (which is expected) ...

 WARNING KERN mmc1: unspecified timeout for CMD6 - use generic
For Tegra, the default timeout used when no timeout is specified for CMD6
is 100mS. So hard-coding the following also appears to workaround the
problem on Tegra ...
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c
index 868653bc1555..5155e0240fca 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c
@@ -992,7 +992,7 @@ int mmc_flush_cache(struct mmc_card *card)
                        (card->ext_csd.cache_size > 0) &&
                        (card->ext_csd.cache_ctrl & 1)) {
                err = mmc_switch(card, EXT_CSD_CMD_SET_NORMAL,
-                                EXT_CSD_FLUSH_CACHE, 1, 0);
+                                EXT_CSD_FLUSH_CACHE, 1, 100);
                if (err)
                        pr_err("%s: cache flush error %d\n",
                                        mmc_hostname(card->host), err);
So the problem appears to be causing by the timeout being too long rather
than not long enough. 

Looking more at the code, I think now that we are hitting the condition
...
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c
index 868653bc1555..feae82b1ff35 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c
@@ -579,8 +579,10 @@ int __mmc_switch(struct mmc_card *card, u8 set, u8 index, u8 value,
         * the host to avoid HW busy detection, by converting to a R1 response
         * instead of a R1B.
         */
-       if (host->max_busy_timeout && (timeout_ms > host->max_busy_timeout))
+       if (host->max_busy_timeout && (timeout_ms > host->max_busy_timeout)) {
+               pr_warn("%s: timeout (%d) > max busy timeout (%d)", mmc_hostname(host), timeout_ms, host->max_busy_timeout);
                use_r1b_resp = false;
+       }

With the above I see ...

 WARNING KERN mmc1: timeout (1600) > max busy timeout (672)

So with the longer timeout we are not using/requesting the response.

Cheers
Jon

-- 
nvpublic
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help