Re: LKFT: arm x15: mmc1: cache flush error -110
From: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Date: 2020-02-25 11:41:38
Also in:
linux-mmc, lkml
Subsystem:
multimedia card (mmc), secure digital (sd) and sdio subsystem, the rest · Maintainers:
Ulf Hansson, Linus Torvalds
On 25/02/2020 10:04, Jon Hunter wrote: ...
quoted
quoted
I find that from the commit the changes in mmc_flush_cache below is the cause. ##@@ -961,7 +963,8 @@ int mmc_flush_cache(struct mmc_card *card) (card->ext_csd.cache_size > 0) && (card->ext_csd.cache_ctrl & 1)) { err = mmc_switch(card, EXT_CSD_CMD_SET_NORMAL, - EXT_CSD_FLUSH_CACHE, 1, 0); + EXT_CSD_FLUSH_CACHE, 1, + MMC_CACHE_FLUSH_TIMEOUT_MS);I no longer see the issue on reverting the above hunk as Bitan suggested but now I see the following (which is expected) ... WARNING KERN mmc1: unspecified timeout for CMD6 - use generic
For Tegra, the default timeout used when no timeout is specified for CMD6 is 100mS. So hard-coding the following also appears to workaround the problem on Tegra ...
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c
index 868653bc1555..5155e0240fca 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c@@ -992,7 +992,7 @@ int mmc_flush_cache(struct mmc_card *card) (card->ext_csd.cache_size > 0) && (card->ext_csd.cache_ctrl & 1)) { err = mmc_switch(card, EXT_CSD_CMD_SET_NORMAL, - EXT_CSD_FLUSH_CACHE, 1, 0); + EXT_CSD_FLUSH_CACHE, 1, 100); if (err) pr_err("%s: cache flush error %d\n", mmc_hostname(card->host), err);
So the problem appears to be causing by the timeout being too long rather than not long enough. Looking more at the code, I think now that we are hitting the condition ...
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c
index 868653bc1555..feae82b1ff35 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c@@ -579,8 +579,10 @@ int __mmc_switch(struct mmc_card *card, u8 set, u8 index, u8 value, * the host to avoid HW busy detection, by converting to a R1 response * instead of a R1B. */ - if (host->max_busy_timeout && (timeout_ms > host->max_busy_timeout)) + if (host->max_busy_timeout && (timeout_ms > host->max_busy_timeout)) { + pr_warn("%s: timeout (%d) > max busy timeout (%d)", mmc_hostname(host), timeout_ms, host->max_busy_timeout); use_r1b_resp = false; + }
With the above I see ... WARNING KERN mmc1: timeout (1600) > max busy timeout (672) So with the longer timeout we are not using/requesting the response. Cheers Jon -- nvpublic