[PATCH v4 1/7] block: Add @flags argument to bdev_write_zeroes_sectors()
From: Kirill Tkhai <hidden>
Date: 2020-01-21 10:42:43
Also in:
dm-devel, lkml
Subsystem:
block layer, device-mapper (lvm), scsi target subsystem, the rest · Maintainers:
Jens Axboe, Alasdair Kergon, Mike Snitzer, Mikulas Patocka, Benjamin Marzinski, "Martin K. Petersen", Linus Torvalds
This is a preparation for next patch, which introduces a new flag BLKDEV_ZERO_ALLOCATE for calls, which need only allocation of blocks and don't need actual blocks zeroing. Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <redacted> Reviewed-by: Bob Liu <redacted> Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com> --- block/blk-lib.c | 6 +++--- drivers/md/dm-kcopyd.c | 2 +- drivers/target/target_core_iblock.c | 4 ++-- include/linux/blkdev.h | 3 ++- 4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-lib.c b/block/blk-lib.c
index 5f2c429d4378..3e38c93cfc53 100644
--- a/block/blk-lib.c
+++ b/block/blk-lib.c@@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ static int __blkdev_issue_write_zeroes(struct block_device *bdev, return -EPERM; /* Ensure that max_write_zeroes_sectors doesn't overflow bi_size */ - max_write_zeroes_sectors = bdev_write_zeroes_sectors(bdev); + max_write_zeroes_sectors = bdev_write_zeroes_sectors(bdev, 0); if (max_write_zeroes_sectors == 0) return -EOPNOTSUPP;
@@ -362,7 +362,7 @@ int blkdev_issue_zeroout(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector, sector_t bs_mask; struct bio *bio; struct blk_plug plug; - bool try_write_zeroes = !!bdev_write_zeroes_sectors(bdev); + bool try_write_zeroes = !!bdev_write_zeroes_sectors(bdev, 0); bs_mask = (bdev_logical_block_size(bdev) >> 9) - 1; if ((sector | nr_sects) & bs_mask)
@@ -391,7 +391,7 @@ int blkdev_issue_zeroout(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector, try_write_zeroes = false; goto retry; } - if (!bdev_write_zeroes_sectors(bdev)) { + if (!bdev_write_zeroes_sectors(bdev, 0)) { /* * Zeroing offload support was indicated, but the * device reported ILLEGAL REQUEST (for some devices
diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-kcopyd.c b/drivers/md/dm-kcopyd.c
index 1bbe4a34ef4c..f1b8e7926dd4 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm-kcopyd.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-kcopyd.c@@ -831,7 +831,7 @@ void dm_kcopyd_copy(struct dm_kcopyd_client *kc, struct dm_io_region *from, */ job->rw = REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES; for (i = 0; i < job->num_dests; i++) - if (!bdev_write_zeroes_sectors(job->dests[i].bdev)) { + if (!bdev_write_zeroes_sectors(job->dests[i].bdev, 0)) { job->rw = WRITE; break; }
diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_iblock.c b/drivers/target/target_core_iblock.c
index 51ffd5c002de..73a63e197bf5 100644
--- a/drivers/target/target_core_iblock.c
+++ b/drivers/target/target_core_iblock.c@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ static int iblock_configure_device(struct se_device *dev) * Enable write same emulation for IBLOCK and use 0xFFFF as * the smaller WRITE_SAME(10) only has a two-byte block count. */ - max_write_zeroes_sectors = bdev_write_zeroes_sectors(bd); + max_write_zeroes_sectors = bdev_write_zeroes_sectors(bd, 0); if (max_write_zeroes_sectors) dev->dev_attrib.max_write_same_len = max_write_zeroes_sectors; else
@@ -468,7 +468,7 @@ iblock_execute_write_same(struct se_cmd *cmd) return TCM_INVALID_CDB_FIELD; } - if (bdev_write_zeroes_sectors(bdev)) { + if (bdev_write_zeroes_sectors(bdev, 0)) { if (!iblock_execute_zero_out(bdev, cmd)) return 0; }
diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h
index 04cfa798a365..0f1127d0b043 100644
--- a/include/linux/blkdev.h
+++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h@@ -1418,7 +1418,8 @@ static inline unsigned int bdev_write_same(struct block_device *bdev) return 0; } -static inline unsigned int bdev_write_zeroes_sectors(struct block_device *bdev) +static inline unsigned int bdev_write_zeroes_sectors(struct block_device *bdev, + unsigned int flags) { struct request_queue *q = bdev_get_queue(bdev);