It's good to have basic unit test coverage of the new FOLL_PIN
behavior. Fortunately, the gup_benchmark unit test is extremely
fast (a few milliseconds), so adding it the the run_vmtests suite
is going to cause no noticeable change in running time.

So, add two new invocations to run_vmtests:

1) Run gup_benchmark with normal get_user_pages().

2) Run gup_benchmark with pin_user_pages(). This is much like
the first call, except that it sets FOLL_PIN.

Running these two in quick succession also provide a visual
comparison of the running times, which is convenient.

The new invocations are fairly early in the run_vmtests script,
because with test suites, it's usually preferable to put the
shorter, faster tests first, all other things being equal.

Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/vm/run_vmtests | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/run_vmtests b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/run_vmtests
index a692ea828317..df6a6bf3f238 100755
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/run_vmtests
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/run_vmtests

@@ -112,6 +112,28 @@ echo "NOTE: The above hugetlb tests provide minimal coverage.  Use"
 echo "      https://github.com/libhugetlbfs/libhugetlbfs.git for"
 echo "      hugetlb regression testing."
 
+echo "--------------------------------------------"
+echo "running 'gup_benchmark -U' (normal/slow gup)"
+echo "--------------------------------------------"
+./gup_benchmark -U
+if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
+	echo "[FAIL]"
+	exitcode=1
+else
+	echo "[PASS]"
+fi
+
+echo "------------------------------------------"
+echo "running gup_benchmark -b (pin_user_pages)"
+echo "------------------------------------------"
+./gup_benchmark -b
+if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
+	echo "[FAIL]"
+	exitcode=1
+else
+	echo "[PASS]"
+fi
+
 echo "-------------------"
 echo "running userfaultfd"
 echo "-------------------"

-- 
2.24.1