Thread (38 messages) 38 messages, 4 authors, 2019-09-24

Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Optimise io_uring completion waiting

From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Date: 2019-09-24 10:09:41
Also in: lkml

On 9/24/19 3:21 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
On 24/09/2019 11:02, Jens Axboe wrote:
quoted
On 9/24/19 1:06 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
quoted
On 24/09/2019 02:00, Jens Axboe wrote:
quoted
quoted
I think we can do the same thing, just wrapping the waitqueue in a
structure with a count in it, on the stack. Got some flight time
coming up later today, let me try and cook up a patch.
Totally untested, and sent out 5 min before departure... But something
like this.
Hmm, reminds me my first version. Basically that's the same thing but
with macroses inlined. I wanted to make it reusable and self-contained,
though.

If you don't think it could be useful in other places, sure, we could do
something like that. Is that so?
I totally agree it could be useful in other places. Maybe formalized and
used with wake_up_nr() instead of adding a new primitive? Haven't looked
into that, I may be talking nonsense.
@nr there is about number of tasks to wake up. AFAIK doesn't solve the
problem.
Ah right, embarassingly I'm actually the one that added that
functionality ages ago...

-- 
Jens Axboe
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help