Re: [PATCH v8 13/13] nvmet-passthru: support block accounting
From: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
Date: 2019-09-09 19:33:15
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, linux-nvme, lkml
On 2019-09-09 1:26 p.m., Sagi Grimberg wrote:
quoted
quoted
quoted
Support block disk accounting by setting the RQF_IO_STAT flag and gendisk in the request. After this change, IO counts will be reflected correctly in /proc/diskstats for drives being used by passthru. Signed-off-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> --- drivers/nvme/target/io-cmd-passthru.c | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)diff --git a/drivers/nvme/target/io-cmd-passthru.c b/drivers/nvme/target/io-cmd-passthru.c index 7557927a3451..63f12750a80d 100644 --- a/drivers/nvme/target/io-cmd-passthru.c +++ b/drivers/nvme/target/io-cmd-passthru.c@@ -410,6 +410,9 @@ static struct request *nvmet_passthru_blk_make_request(struct nvmet_req *req, if (unlikely(IS_ERR(rq))) return rq; + if (blk_queue_io_stat(q) && cmd->common.opcode != nvme_cmd_flush) + rq->rq_flags |= RQF_IO_STAT;Thanks for the review!quoted
Does flush has data bytes in the request? Why the special casing?Well it was special cased in the vanilla blk account flow... But I think it's required to be special cased so the IO and in_flight counts don't count flushes (as they do not for regular block device traffic).I think that the accounting exclude I/O that is yielded from the flush sequence. Don't think its relevant here...
What? Per blk_account_io_done(), RQF_FLUSH_SEQ will not be set by us for passthru commands and I don't think it's appropriate to do so. Thus, if we set RQF_IO_STAT for passthru flush commands, they will be counted which we do not want. Logan