Re: [PATCH v2] nbd: replace kill_bdev() with __invalidate_device() again

On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 08:13:10PM +0800, SunKe wrote:

From: Munehisa Kamata <redacted>

Commit abbbdf12497d ("replace kill_bdev() with __invalidate_device()")
once did this, but 29eaadc03649 ("nbd: stop using the bdev everywhere")
resurrected kill_bdev() and it has been there since then. So buffer_head
mappings still get killed on a server disconnection, and we can still
hit the BUG_ON on a filesystem on the top of the nbd device.

  EXT4-fs (nbd0): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts: (null)
  block nbd0: Receive control failed (result -32)
  block nbd0: shutting down sockets
  print_req_error: I/O error, dev nbd0, sector 66264 flags 3000
  EXT4-fs warning (device nbd0): htree_dirblock_to_tree:979: inode #2: lblock 0: comm ls: error -5 reading directory block
  print_req_error: I/O error, dev nbd0, sector 2264 flags 3000
  EXT4-fs error (device nbd0): __ext4_get_inode_loc:4690: inode #2: block 283: comm ls: unable to read itable block
  EXT4-fs error (device nbd0) in ext4_reserve_inode_write:5894: IO failure
  ------------[ cut here ]------------
  kernel BUG at fs/buffer.c:3057!
  invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
  CPU: 7 PID: 40045 Comm: jbd2/nbd0-8 Not tainted 5.1.0-rc3+ #4
  Hardware name: Amazon EC2 m5.12xlarge/, BIOS 1.0 10/16/2017
  RIP: 0010:submit_bh_wbc+0x18b/0x190
  ...
  Call Trace:
   jbd2_write_superblock+0xf1/0x230 [jbd2]
   ? account_entity_enqueue+0xc5/0xf0
   jbd2_journal_update_sb_log_tail+0x94/0xe0 [jbd2]
   jbd2_journal_commit_transaction+0x12f/0x1d20 [jbd2]
   ? __switch_to_asm+0x40/0x70
   ...
   ? lock_timer_base+0x67/0x80
   kjournald2+0x121/0x360 [jbd2]
   ? remove_wait_queue+0x60/0x60
   kthread+0xf8/0x130
   ? commit_timeout+0x10/0x10 [jbd2]
   ? kthread_bind+0x10/0x10
   ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40

With __invalidate_device(), I no longer hit the BUG_ON with sync or
unmount on the disconnected device.

Jeeze I swear I see this same patch go by every 6 months or so, not sure what
happens to it.  Anyway

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>

Thanks,

Josef