On 6/29/19 10:28 AM, Scott Bauer wrote:

On Sat, Jun 29, 2019 at 10:26:52AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:

quoted

On 6/29/19 10:19 AM, Scott Bauer wrote:

quoted

Hey Jens,

Can you please stage these for 5.3 aswell?

Yes, looks fine to me. But it conflicts with the psid revert in terms
of ioctl numbering. You fine with me renumbering IOC_OPAL_MBR_DONE to:

#define IOC_OPAL_MBR_DONE           _IOW('p', 233, struct opal_mbr_done)

Sorry for the conflict. That's fine. I'll fix up userland tooling.

Renamed 232 -> 233, and 233 -> 234, for the two conflicts. So now we have:

#define IOC_OPAL_PSID_REVERT_TPR    _IOW('p', 232, struct opal_key)
#define IOC_OPAL_MBR_DONE           _IOW('p', 233, struct opal_mbr_done)
#define IOC_OPAL_WRITE_SHADOW_MBR   _IOW('p', 234, struct opal_shadow_mbr)

-- 
Jens Axboe