Thread (65 messages) 65 messages, 9 authors, 2019-06-17

Re: [PATCH 3/7] vfs: Add a mount-notification facility

From: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Date: 2019-05-29 15:54:04
Also in: keyrings, linux-api, linux-fsdevel, linux-security-module, lkml

On 5/29/2019 4:00 AM, David Howells wrote:
Jann Horn [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
quoted
+void post_mount_notification(struct mount *changed,
+                            struct mount_notification *notify)
+{
+       const struct cred *cred = current_cred();
This current_cred() looks bogus to me. Can't mount topology changes
come from all sorts of places? For example, umount_mnt() from
umount_tree() from dissolve_on_fput() from __fput(), which could
happen pretty much anywhere depending on where the last reference gets
dropped?
IIRC, that's what Casey argued is the right thing to do from a security PoV.
Casey?
You need to identify the credential of the subject that triggered
the event. If it isn't current_cred(), the cred needs to be passed
in to post_mount_notification(), or derived by some other means.
Maybe I should pass in NULL creds in the case that an event is being generated
because an object is being destroyed due to the last usage[*] being removed.
You should pass the cred of the process that removed the
last usage. If the last usage was removed by something like
the power being turned off on a disk drive a system cred
should be used. Someone or something caused the event. It can
be important who it was.
 [*] Usage, not ref - Superblocks are a bit weird in their accounting.

David
  

Attachments

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help