Re: [PATCH] block: Mark expected switch fall-throughs
From: Chaitanya Kulkarni <hidden>
Date: 2019-01-24 04:54:56
Also in:
lkml
Subsystem:
block layer, drbd driver, the rest · Maintainers:
Jens Axboe, Philipp Reisner, Lars Ellenberg, Christoph Böhmwalder, Linus Torvalds
Looks good. Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni <redacted> From: linux-block-owner@vger.kernel.org <redacted> on behalf of Gustavo A. R. Silva <redacted> Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2019 10:45 PM To: Philipp Reisner; Lars Ellenberg; Jens Axboe; Joshua Morris; Philip Kelleher Cc: drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com; linux-block@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Gustavo A. R. Silva Subject: [PATCH] block: Mark expected switch fall-throughs In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. This patch fixes the following warnings: drivers/block/drbd/drbd_int.h:1774:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] drivers/block/drbd/drbd_int.h:1774:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] drivers/block/drbd/drbd_int.h:1774:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] drivers/block/drbd/drbd_int.h:1774:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] drivers/block/drbd/drbd_int.h:1774:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] drivers/block/drbd/drbd_receiver.c:3093:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] drivers/block/drbd/drbd_receiver.c:3120:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] drivers/block/drbd/drbd_req.c:856:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3 This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <redacted> --- drivers/block/drbd/drbd_int.h | 2 +- drivers/block/drbd/drbd_receiver.c | 4 ++-- drivers/block/drbd/drbd_req.c | 2 +- drivers/block/rsxx/core.c | 1 + 4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_int.h b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_int.h
index 000a2f4c0e92..f070f7200fc0 100644
--- a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_int.h
+++ b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_int.h@@ -1778,7 +1778,7 @@ static inline void __drbd_chk_io_error_(struct drbd_device *device,_drbd_set_state(_NS(device, disk, D_INCONSISTENT), CS_HARD, NULL); break; } - /* NOTE fall through for DRBD_META_IO_ERROR or DRBD_FORCE_DETACH */ + /* fall through - for DRBD_META_IO_ERROR or DRBD_FORCE_DETACH */ case EP_DETACH: case EP_CALL_HELPER: /* Remember whether we saw a READ or WRITE error.
diff --git a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_receiver.c b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_receiver.c
index c7ad88d91a09..74350663443f 100644
--- a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_receiver.c
+++ b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_receiver.c@@ -3094,7 +3094,7 @@ static int drbd_asb_recover_0p(struct drbd_peer_device *peer_device) __must_hold rv = 1;
break;
}
- /* Else fall through to one of the other strategies... */
+ /* Else fall through - to one of the other strategies... */
case ASB_DISCARD_OLDER_PRI:
if (self == 0 && peer == 1) {
rv = 1;@@ -3119,7 +3119,7 @@ static int drbd_asb_recover_0p(struct drbd_peer_device *peer_device) __must_hold} if (after_sb_0p == ASB_DISCARD_ZERO_CHG) break; - /* else: fall through */ + /* else, fall through */ case ASB_DISCARD_LEAST_CHG: if (ch_self < ch_peer) rv = -1;
diff --git a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_req.c b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_req.c
index 643a04af213b..3809c7e6be8c 100644
--- a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_req.c
+++ b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_req.c@@ -866,7 +866,7 @@ int __req_mod(struct drbd_request *req, enum drbd_req_event what,} /* else: FIXME can this happen? */ break; } - /* else, fall through to BARRIER_ACKED */ + /* else, fall through - to BARRIER_ACKED */ case BARRIER_ACKED: /* barrier ack for READ requests does not make sense */
diff --git a/drivers/block/rsxx/core.c b/drivers/block/rsxx/core.c
index 0cf4509d575c..898d522e8338 100644
--- a/drivers/block/rsxx/core.c
+++ b/drivers/block/rsxx/core.c@@ -439,6 +439,7 @@ static void card_state_change(struct rsxx_cardinfo *card, * Fall through so the DMA devices can be attached and
* the user can attempt to pull off their data.
*/
+ /* fall through */
case CARD_STATE_GOOD:
st = rsxx_get_card_size8(card, &card->size8);
if (st)
--
2.20.1