Thread (13 messages) 13 messages, 4 authors, 2018-12-18

RE: [PATCH V2] blk-mq: Set request mapping to NULL in blk_mq_put_driver_tag

From: Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@broadcom.com>
Date: 2018-12-18 18:08:51

On 12/18/18 10:48 AM, Kashyap Desai wrote:
quoted
quoted
On 12/18/18 10:08 AM, Kashyap Desai wrote:
quoted
quoted
quoted
Other block drivers (e.g. ib_srp, skd) do not need this to work
reliably.
It has been explained to you that the bug that you reported can be
fixed by modifying the mpt3sas driver. So why to fix this by
modifying the block layer? Additionally, what prevents that a race
condition occurs between the block layer clearing
hctx->tags->rqs[rq->tag] and
scsi_host_find_tag() reading that same array element? I'm afraid
that this is an attempt to paper over a real problem instead of
fixing the root
cause.

I have to agree with Bart here, I just don't see how the mpt3sas
use case is special. The change will paper over the issue in any
case.
Hi Jens, Bart

One of the key requirement for iterating whole tagset  using
scsi_host_find_tag is to block scsi host. Once we are done that, we
should be good. No race condition is possible if that part is taken
care.
Without this patch, if driver still receive scsi command from the
hctx->tags->rqs which is really not outstanding.  I am finding this
hctx->tags->is
common issue for many scsi low level drivers.

Just for example <fnic> - fnic_is_abts_pending() function has below
code -

        for (tag = 0; tag < fnic->fnic_max_tag_id; tag++) {
                sc = scsi_host_find_tag(fnic->lport->host, tag);
                /*
                 * ignore this lun reset cmd or cmds that do not
belong to
                 * this lun
                 */
                if (!sc || (lr_sc && (sc->device != lun_dev || sc ==
lr_sc)))
                        continue;

Above code also has similar exposure of kernel panic like <mpt3sas>
driver while accessing sc->device.

Panic is more obvious if we have add/removal of scsi device before
looping through scsi_host_find_tag().

Avoiding block layer changes is also attempted in <mpt3sas> but our
problem is to convert that code common for non-mq and mq.
Temporary to unblock this issue, We have fixed <mpt3sas> using
driver internals scsiio_tracker() instead of piggy back in
scsi_command.
For mq, the requests never go out of scope, they are always valid. So
the key question here is WHY they have been freed. If the queue gets
killed, then one potential solution would be to clear pointers in the
tag map belonging to that queue. That also takes it out of the hot
path.
At driver load whenever driver does scsi_add_host_with_dma(), it
follows below code path in block layer.

scsi_mq_setup_tags
  ->blk_mq_alloc_tag_set
          -> blk_mq_alloc_rq_maps
                     -> __blk_mq_alloc_rq_maps

SML create two set of request pool. One is per HBA and other is per
SDEV. I was confused why SML creates request pool per HBA.

Example - IF HBA queue depth is 1K and there are 8 device behind that
HBA, total request pool is created is 1K + 8 * scsi_device queue
depth. 1K will be always static, but other request pool is managed
whenever scsi device is added/removed.

I never observe requests allocated per HBA is used in IO path. It is
always request allocated per scsi device is what active.
Also, what I observed is whenever scsi_device is deleted, associated
request is also deleted. What is missing is - "Deleted request still
available in
hctx->tags->rqs[rq->tag]."
So that sounds like the issue. If the device is deleted and its requests
go away,
those pointers should be cleared. That's what your patch should do, not do
it
for each IO.
At the time of device removal,  it requires reverse traversing.  Find out if
each requests associated with sdev is part of hctx->tags->rqs() and clear
that entry.
Not sure about atomic traverse if more than one device removal is happening
in parallel.  May be more error prone. ?

Just wondering both the way we will be removing invalid request from array.
Are you suspecting any performance issue if we do it per IO ?

Kashyap

--
Jens Axboe
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help