Re: [PATCH 4/4] block: expose devt for GENHD_FL_HIDDEN disks

On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 01:25:33PM -0200, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:

quoted

And I've checked back - lsblk actually works just fine at the moment.
But it turns out once we create the slave links it stops working,
which is a really good argument against the first two patches, which
would otherwise seem nice..

Which is why I have sent the "paths/" patchset in the first place. Because I
did some homework and read the previous discussion about this, and how lsblk
failure to behave with slave links led to the revert of the slaves/holders
patch by Dr. Hannes.

Sorry, I did not actually notice that Hannes patch manually created
the same slaves/holders link we otherwise create using the block layer
APIs.  Had I realized those actually were the same that had saved
me some work.

So I guess the v2 paths/ link patch from you is the least of all evils.
Hannes, can you look over that one?