Re: [PATCH 0/5] block: introduce helpers for allocating io buffer from slab
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Date: 2018-10-18 23:07:33
Also in:
linux-fsdevel
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 04:05:51PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 07:03:42AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:quoted
Before we go down this road, could we have a discussion about what hardware actually requires this? Storage has this weird assumption that I/Os must be at least 512 byte aligned in memory, and I don't know where this idea comes from. Network devices can do arbitrary byte alignment. Even USB controllers can do arbitrary byte alignment. Sure, performance is going to suck and there are definite risks on some architectures with doing IOs that are sub-cacheline aligned, but why is storage such a special snowflake that we assume that host controllers are only capable of doing 512-byte aligned DMAs?Actually most storage controllers requires 4-byte alignment, but there is a significant subset that requires 512-byte alignment.
Can you name one that does require 512-byte alignment, preferably still in use? Or even >4-byte alignment. I just checked AHCI and that requires only 2-byte alignment. I have reason to believe that these are uncommon because of the feedback we got in the NVMe committee after releasing 1.0 which required 4-byte alignment from people whining that they just couldn't guarantee 4-byte alignment in their host devices and they absolutely needed to have no alignment requirements (!)