On Mon, 2018-08-06 at 08:27 +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:

I am not sure this is going to work for SCSI parallel; we're usin=

g the

QUIESCE state there to do domain validation, and all commands there a=

re

most definitely not PM requests.
Can you please validate your patches with eg aic7xxx and SCSI paralle=

l

disks?

Hello Hannes,

How about using the RQF_PM flag for SCSI parallel requests instead of
RQF_PREEMPT? That change will also avoid that RQF_PREEMPT has a dou=
ble meaning.
Anyway, I will see whether I can drop that change from this series and subm=
it
that change seperately.

Thanks,

Bart.