Re: [PATCH 1/4] xen/blkback: don't keep persistent grants too long
From: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Date: 2018-08-07 06:34:49
Also in:
lkml
On 06/08/18 17:58, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 01:33:59PM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:quoted
Persistent grants are allocated until a threshold per ring is being reached. Those grants won't be freed until the ring is being destroyed meaning there will be resources kept busy which might no longer be used. Instead of freeing only persistent grants until the threshold is reached add a timestamp and remove all persistent grants not having been in use for a minute. Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> --- drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- drivers/block/xen-blkback/common.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)You should document this new parameter in Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-xen-blkback.
Yes.
quoted
diff --git a/drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c b/drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c index b55b245e8052..485e3ecab144 100644 --- a/drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c +++ b/drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c@@ -84,6 +84,18 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(max_persistent_grants, "Maximum number of grants to map persistently"); /* + * How long a persistent grant is allowed to remain allocated without being in + * use. The time is in seconds, 0 means indefinitely long. + */ + +unsigned int xen_blkif_pgrant_timeout = 60; +module_param_named(persistent_grant_unused_seconds, xen_blkif_pgrant_timeout, + uint, 0644); +MODULE_PARM_DESC(persistent_grant_unused_seconds, + "Time in seconds an unused persistent grant is allowed to " + "remain allocated. Default is 60, 0 means unlimited."); + +/* * Maximum number of rings/queues blkback supports, allow as many queues as there * are CPUs if user has not specified a value. */@@ -123,6 +135,13 @@ module_param(log_stats, int, 0644); /* Number of free pages to remove on each call to gnttab_free_pages */ #define NUM_BATCH_FREE_PAGES 10 +static inline bool persistent_gnt_timeout(struct persistent_gnt *persistent_gnt) +{ + return xen_blkif_pgrant_timeout && + (jiffies - persistent_gnt->last_used >= + HZ * xen_blkif_pgrant_timeout); +} + static inline int get_free_page(struct xen_blkif_ring *ring, struct page **page) { unsigned long flags;@@ -278,6 +297,7 @@ static void put_persistent_gnt(struct xen_blkif_ring *ring, { if(!test_bit(PERSISTENT_GNT_ACTIVE, persistent_gnt->flags)) pr_alert_ratelimited("freeing a grant already unused\n"); + persistent_gnt->last_used = jiffies; set_bit(PERSISTENT_GNT_WAS_ACTIVE, persistent_gnt->flags); clear_bit(PERSISTENT_GNT_ACTIVE, persistent_gnt->flags); atomic_dec(&ring->persistent_gnt_in_use);@@ -374,23 +394,23 @@ static void purge_persistent_gnt(struct xen_blkif_ring *ring) bool scan_used = false, clean_used = false; struct rb_root *root; - if (ring->persistent_gnt_c < xen_blkif_max_pgrants || - (ring->persistent_gnt_c == xen_blkif_max_pgrants && - !ring->blkif->vbd.overflow_max_grants)) { - goto out; - } - if (work_busy(&ring->persistent_purge_work)) { pr_alert_ratelimited("Scheduled work from previous purge is still busy, cannot purge list\n"); goto out; } - num_clean = (xen_blkif_max_pgrants / 100) * LRU_PERCENT_CLEAN; - num_clean = ring->persistent_gnt_c - xen_blkif_max_pgrants + num_clean; - num_clean = min(ring->persistent_gnt_c, num_clean); - if ((num_clean == 0) || - (num_clean > (ring->persistent_gnt_c - atomic_read(&ring->persistent_gnt_in_use)))) - goto out; + if (ring->persistent_gnt_c < xen_blkif_max_pgrants || + (ring->persistent_gnt_c == xen_blkif_max_pgrants && + !ring->blkif->vbd.overflow_max_grants)) { + num_clean = 0; + } else { + num_clean = (xen_blkif_max_pgrants / 100) * LRU_PERCENT_CLEAN; + num_clean = ring->persistent_gnt_c - xen_blkif_max_pgrants + + num_clean; + num_clean = min(ring->persistent_gnt_c, num_clean); + pr_debug("Going to purge at least %u persistent grants\n", + num_clean); + } /* * At this point, we can assure that there will be no calls@@ -401,9 +421,7 @@ static void purge_persistent_gnt(struct xen_blkif_ring *ring) * number of grants. */ - total = num_clean; - - pr_debug("Going to purge %u persistent grants\n", num_clean); + total = 0; BUG_ON(!list_empty(&ring->persistent_purge_list)); root = &ring->persistent_gnts;@@ -419,39 +437,42 @@ static void purge_persistent_gnt(struct xen_blkif_ring *ring) if (test_bit(PERSISTENT_GNT_ACTIVE, persistent_gnt->flags)) continue; - if (!scan_used && + if (!scan_used && !persistent_gnt_timeout(persistent_gnt) && (test_bit(PERSISTENT_GNT_WAS_ACTIVE, persistent_gnt->flags)))If you store the jiffies of the time when the grant was last used it seems like we could get rid of the PERSISTENT_GNT_WAS_ACTIVE flag and instead use the per-grant jiffies and the jiffies from the last scan in order to decide which grants to remove?
True. This might make the control flow a little bit easier to understand. Juergen