Thread (14 messages) 14 messages, 3 authors, 2018-08-03

Re: [RFC] blk-mq: clean up the hctx restart

From: Bart Van Assche <hidden>
Date: 2018-08-02 17:09:00
Also in: lkml

On Fri, 2018-08-03 at 00:58 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
And about the situations you mentioned, no any special as normal case=
s
or thousands of LUNs. Just a batch of queues are waken up from one
single wait queue(sbq_wait_state), and inside each wait queue=
, queues
are handled actually in FIFO order.
=20
Or what is your expected ideal behaviour about fairness?
Hello Ming,

What I expect is if the number of LUNs is really large that all LUNs are tr=
eated
equally. Unless someone can set up a test that demonstrates that this is st=
ill
the case for commit 97889f9ac24f ("blk-mq: remove synchronize_rcu()=
 from
blk_mq_del_queue_tag_set()"), I will assume that th=
at commit breaks fairness.

Bart.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help