Re: [RFC] blk-mq: clean up the hctx restart
From: Bart Van Assche <hidden>
Date: 2018-08-02 17:09:00
Also in:
lkml
From: Bart Van Assche <hidden>
Date: 2018-08-02 17:09:00
Also in:
lkml
On Fri, 2018-08-03 at 00:58 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
And about the situations you mentioned, no any special as normal case=
s
or thousands of LUNs. Just a batch of queues are waken up from one single wait queue(sbq_wait_state), and inside each wait queue=
, queues
are handled actually in FIFO order. =20 Or what is your expected ideal behaviour about fairness?
Hello Ming,
What I expect is if the number of LUNs is really large that all LUNs are tr=
eated
equally. Unless someone can set up a test that demonstrates that this is st=
ill
the case for commit 97889f9ac24f ("blk-mq: remove synchronize_rcu()=
from
blk_mq_del_queue_tag_set()"), I will assume that th=
at commit breaks fairness.
Bart.