Re: [PATCH] block: ioprio: Replace GFP_ATOMIC with GFP_KERNEL in set_task_ioprio()

[PATCH] block: ioprio: Replace GFP_ATOMIC with GFP_KERNEL in set_task_ioprio() · Jia-Ju Bai <hidden> · 2018-07-23
Re: [PATCH] block: ioprio: Replace GFP_ATOMIC with GFP_KERNEL in set_task_ioprio() · Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> · 2018-07-23
Re: [PATCH] block: ioprio: Replace GFP_ATOMIC with GFP_KERNEL in set_task_ioprio() · Jia-Ju Bai <hidden> · 2018-07-23
Re: [PATCH] block: ioprio: Replace GFP_ATOMIC with GFP_KERNEL in set_task_ioprio() · Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> · 2018-07-23
Re: [PATCH] block: ioprio: Replace GFP_ATOMIC with GFP_KERNEL in set_task_ioprio() · Jia-Ju Bai <hidden> · 2018-07-24
[LKP] [block] 8448e82606: WARNING:suspicious_RCU_usage · kernel test robot <hidden> · 2018-07-24

From: Jia-Ju Bai <hidden>
Date: 2018-07-23 12:59:18
Also in: lkml

Thanks for the reply :)


On 2018/7/23 15:18, Christoph Hellwig wrote:

Looks good,

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

But to me it seems that btrfs and maybe ext4 as well would be much
better off just setting a per-IO priority in the bio.

Any chance yo could look into that?

In fact, my tool does not report any defects in btrfs and ext4.


Best wishes,
Jia-Ju Bai

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help