On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 10:14:04AM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:

Hello, Omar.

On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 02:14:44PM -0800, Omar Sandoval wrote:

quoted

quoted

 	wake_index = atomic_read(&sbq->wake_index);
 	for (i = 0; i < SBQ_WAIT_QUEUES; i++) {
 		struct sbq_wait_state *ws = &sbq->ws[wake_index];

So I think we want a patch for the test_and_set_bit_lock() and
clear_bit_unlock(), but the rest should stay as-is.

Yeah, that makes sense to me.  Would you be interested in updating the
patch?

Yup, I'll send it up. Thanks, Tejun!