Re: how can one drain MQ request queue ?
From: Ming Lei <hidden>
Date: 2018-02-22 13:10:43
Also in:
linux-nvme
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 12:56:05PM +0200, Max Gurtovoy wrote:
On 2/22/2018 4:59 AM, Ming Lei wrote:quoted
Hi Max,Hi Ming,quoted
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 11:56:07AM +0200, Max Gurtovoy wrote:quoted
hi all, is there a way to drain a blk-mq based request queue (similar to blk_drain_queue for non MQ) ?Generally speaking, blk_mq_freeze_queue() should be fine to drain blk-mq based request queue, but it may not work well when the hardware is broken.I tried that, but the path failover takes ~cmd_timeout seconds and this is not good enough...
Yeah, I agree it isn't good for handling timeout.
quoted
quoted
I try to fix the following situation: Running DM-multipath over NVMEoF/RDMA block devices, toggling the switch ports during traffic using fio and making sure the traffic never fails. when the switch port goes down the initiator driver start an error recoveryWhat is the code you are referring to?from nvme_rdma driver: static void nvme_rdma_error_recovery_work(struct work_struct *work) { struct nvme_rdma_ctrl *ctrl = container_of(work, struct nvme_rdma_ctrl, err_work); nvme_stop_keep_alive(&ctrl->ctrl); if (ctrl->ctrl.queue_count > 1) { nvme_stop_queues(&ctrl->ctrl); blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter(&ctrl->tag_set, nvme_cancel_request, &ctrl->ctrl); nvme_rdma_destroy_io_queues(ctrl, false); } blk_mq_quiesce_queue(ctrl->ctrl.admin_q); blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter(&ctrl->admin_tag_set, nvme_cancel_request, &ctrl->ctrl); nvme_rdma_destroy_admin_queue(ctrl, false);
I am not sure if it is good to destroy admin queue here since nvme_rdma_configure_admin_queue() need to use admin queue, and I saw there is report of 'nvme nvme0: Identify namespace failed' in Red Hat BZ.
/* * queues are not a live anymore, so restart the queues to fail fast * new IO */ blk_mq_unquiesce_queue(ctrl->ctrl.admin_q); nvme_start_queues(&ctrl->ctrl); if (!nvme_change_ctrl_state(&ctrl->ctrl, NVME_CTRL_CONNECTING)) { /* state change failure should never happen */ WARN_ON_ONCE(1); return; } nvme_rdma_reconnect_or_remove(ctrl); }quoted
quoted
process - blk_mq_quiesce_queue for each namespace request queueblk_mq_quiesce_queue() only guarantees that no requests can be dispatched to low level driver, and new requests still can be allocated, but can't be dispatched until the queue becomes unquiesced.quoted
- cancel all requests of the tagset using blk_mq_tagset_busy_iterGenerally blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter() is used to cancel all in-flight requests, and it depends on implementation of the busy_tag_iter_fn, and timed-out request can't be covered by blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter().How can we deal with timed-out commands ?
For PCI NVMe, they are handled by requeuing, just like all canceled in-flight commands, and all these commands will be dispatched to driver again after reset is done successfully.
quoted
So blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter() is often used in error recovery path, such as nvme_dev_disable(), which is usually used in resetting PCIe NVMe controller.quoted
- destroy the QPs/RDMA connections and MR pools - blk_mq_unquiesce_queue for each namespace request queue - reconnect to the target (after creating RDMA resources again) During the QP destruction, I see a warning that not all the memory regions were back to the mr_pool. For every request we get from the block layer (well, almost every request) we get a MR from the MR pool. So what I see is that, depends on the timing, some requests are dispatched/completed after we blk_mq_unquiesce_queue and after we destroy the QP and the MR pool. Probably these request were inserted during quiescing,Yes.maybe we need to update the nvmf_check_init_req to check that the ctrl is in NVME_CTRL_LIVE state (otherwise return IOERR), but I need to think about it and test it.quoted
quoted
and I want to flush/drain them before I destroy the QP.As mentioned above, you can't do that by blk_mq_quiesce_queue() & blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter(). The PCIe NVMe driver takes two steps for the error recovery: nvme_dev_disable() & nvme_reset_work(), and you may consider the similar approach, but the in-flight requests won't be drained in this case because they can be requeued. Could you explain a bit what your exact problem is?The problem is that I assign an MR from QP mr_pool for each call to nvme_rdma_queue_rq. During the error recovery I destroy the QP and the mr_pool *but* some MR's are missing and not returned to the pool.
OK, looks you think all in-flight requests can be completed during error recovery. That shouldn't be correct since all in-flight requests have to be retried after error recovery is done for avoiding data loss. So seems the mr_pool shouldn't be destroyed, I guess. Thanks, Ming