Re: WARNING in kmalloc_slab (3)
From: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Date: 2018-02-07 04:58:56
Also in:
lkml
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 10:22 PM, Eric Biggers [off-list ref] wrote:
On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 12:26:32PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:quoted
On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 09:18:05AM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:quoted
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 9:14 AM, Dan Carpenter [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Sun, Dec 03, 2017 at 12:16:08PM -0800, Eric Biggers wrote:quoted
Looks like BLKTRACESETUP doesn't limit the '.buf_nr' parameter, allowing anyone who can open a block device to cause an extremely large kmalloc. Here's a simplified reproducer:There are lots of places which allow people to allocate as much as they want. With Syzcaller, you might want to just hard code a __GFP_NOWARN in to disable it.Hi, Hard code it where?My idea was to just make warn_alloc() a no-op.quoted
User-controllable allocation are supposed to use __GFP_NOWARN.No that's not right. What we don't want is unprivileged users to use all the memory and we don't want unprivileged users to spam /var/log/messages. But you have to have slightly elevated permissions to open block devices right? The warning is helpful. Admins should "don't do that" if they don't want the warning.WARN_ON() should only be used for kernel bugs. printk can be a different story. If it's a "userspace shouldn't do this" kind of thing, then if there is any message at all it should be a rate-limited printk that actually explains what the problem is, not a random WARN_ON() that can only be interpreted by kernel developers. And yes, the fact that anyone with read access to any block device, even e.g. a loop device, can cause the kernel to do an unbounded kmalloc *is* a bug. It needs to have a reasonable limit. It is not a problem on all systems, but on some systems "the admin" might give users read access to some block devices.
#syz fix: kernel/relay.c: limit kmalloc size to KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE