Thread (4 messages) 4 messages, 3 authors, 2018-01-19

Re: [PATCH v3 RESEND 2/2] blk-throttle: fix wrong initialization in case of dm device

From: Mike Snitzer <hidden>
Date: 2018-01-19 03:29:09
Also in: dm-devel

On Thu, Jan 18 2018 at 10:09pm -0500,
Joseph Qi [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
From: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>

DM device sets QUEUE_FLAG_NONROT after the queue is registered. That is
to mean, the previous initialization in blk_throtl_register_queue is
wrong in this case.
Fix it by checking and then updating the info during root tg
initialization as we don't have a better choice.

Signed-off-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>
---
 block/blk-throttle.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
diff --git a/block/blk-throttle.c b/block/blk-throttle.c
index bf52035..7150f14 100644
--- a/block/blk-throttle.c
+++ b/block/blk-throttle.c
@@ -541,6 +541,25 @@ static void throtl_pd_init(struct blkg_policy_data *pd)
 	if (cgroup_subsys_on_dfl(io_cgrp_subsys) && blkg->parent)
 		sq->parent_sq = &blkg_to_tg(blkg->parent)->service_queue;
 	tg->td = td;
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_THROTTLING_LOW
+	/*
+	 * DM device sets QUEUE_FLAG_NONROT after the queue is registered,
+	 * so the previous initialization is wrong in this case. Check and
+	 * update it here.
+	 */
+	if (blk_queue_nonrot(blkg->q) &&
+	    td->filtered_latency != LATENCY_FILTERED_SSD) {
+		int i;
+
+		td->throtl_slice = DFL_THROTL_SLICE_SSD;
+		td->filtered_latency = LATENCY_FILTERED_SSD;
+		for (i = 0; i < LATENCY_BUCKET_SIZE; i++) {
+			td->avg_buckets[READ][i].latency = 0;
+			td->avg_buckets[WRITE][i].latency = 0;
+		}
+	}
+#endif
 }
 
 /*
-- 
1.9.4
This should be fixed for 4.16, please see these block tree commits:
http://git.kernel.dk/cgit/linux-block/commit/?h=for-4.16/block&id=fa70d2e2c4a0a54ced98260c6a176cc94c876d27
http://git.kernel.dk/cgit/linux-block/commit/?h=for-4.16/block&id=c100ec49fdd2222836ff8a17c7bfcc7611d2ee2b

The last commit's patch header even references the previous submission
you had for this patch with:

"These changes also stave off the need to introduce new DM-specific
workarounds in block core, e.g. this proposal:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10067961/"
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help