Thread (3 messages) 3 messages, 2 authors, 2017-12-08

Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] scsi: Fix a scsi_show_rq() NULL pointer dereference

From: Ming Lei <hidden>
Date: 2017-12-08 08:44:56
Also in: linux-scsi, stable

Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)

Hi Martin,

On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 09:46:21PM -0500, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
Ming,
quoted
As I explained in [1], the use-after-free is inevitable no matter if
clearing 'SCpnt->cmnd' before mempool_free() in sd_uninit_command() or
not, so we need to comment the fact that cdb may point to garbage
data, and this function(especially __scsi_format_command() has to
survive that, so that people won't be surprised when kasan complains
use-after-free, and guys will be careful when they try to change the
code in future.
Longer term we really need to get rid of the separate CDB allocation. It
was a necessary evil when I did it. And not much of a concern since I
did not expect anybody sane to use Type 2 (it's designed for use inside
disk arrays).

However, I keep hearing about people using Type 2 drives. Some vendors
source drives formatted that way and use the same SKU for arrays and
standalone servers.

So we should really look into making it possible for a queue to have a
bigger than 16-byte built-in CDB. For Type 2 devices, 32-byte reads and
writes are a prerequisite. So it would be nice to be able to switch a
queue to a larger allocation post creation (we won't know the type until
after READ CAPACITY(16) has been sent).
I am wondering why you don't make __cmd[] in scsi_request defined as 32bytes?
Even for some hosts with thousands of tag, the memory waste is still not
too much.

Or if you prefer to do post creation, we have sbitmap_queue now, which can
help to build a pre-allocated memory pool easily, and its allocation/free is
pretty efficient.

Thanks,
Ming
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help