On 2017/12/04 17:25, Eryu Guan wrote:

On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 05:15:17PM +0800, Xiao Yang wrote:

quoted

On 2017/12/04 16:29, Eryu Guan wrote:

quoted

On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 08:02:26PM +0800, Xiao Yang wrote:

quoted

If the entire block device is formatted with a filesystem and
mounted, running "blockdev --rereadpt" should fail and return
EBUSY instead of pass.

Signed-off-by: Xiao Yang<redacted>

As we have blktests[1] now, I think this may fit in blktests better?

Hi Eryu,

Do you think test cases which use scsi_debug module should be moved into
blktests?
(e.g. generic/108, generic/349, generic/350, generic/351)

I don't think they need to be moved to blktests. Most other tests that
take use of scsi_debug are for filesystem testing, e.g. generic/108.
generic/349 generic/35[01] are a bit special, they were there before
blktests was announced available, so they're in a special blockdev group
and not in the auto group. If Omar agrees, I think they can be ported to
blktests.

Hi Eryu,

Thanks for your explanation, and i will try to send it to blktests.

Thanks,
Xiao Yang

Thanks,
Eryu