Thread (37 messages) 37 messages, 6 authors, 2017-12-21

Re: [PATCHSET v2] blk-mq: reimplement timeout handling

From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Date: 2017-12-12 21:40:12
Also in: lkml

Hello, Jens.

On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 01:23:01PM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
I like this a lot, it's a lot less fragile and more intuitive/readable
than what we have now. And apparently less error prone... I'll do
some testing with this.
Great.
BTW, since youadd a few more BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING checks, I think something
like the below would be a good cleanup on top of this.

From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Subject: [PATCH] blk-mq: move hctx lock/unlock into a helper

Move the RCU vs SRCU logic into lock/unlock helpers, which makes
the actual functional bits within the locked region much easier
to read.

Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Yeah, that's a lot better.  It might also be a good idea to add
lockdep_assert_hctx_locked() for verification and documentation.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help