Re: possible deadlock in blk_trace_remove
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Date: 2017-12-04 00:47:45
Also in:
lkml
On 12/03/2017 05:44 PM, Eric Biggers wrote:
On Sun, Dec 03, 2017 at 05:24:32PM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:quoted
On 12/03/2017 01:24 PM, Eric Biggers wrote:quoted
On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 02:36:01AM -0800, syzbot wrote:quoted
Hello, syzkaller hit the following crash on d9e0e63d9a6f88440eb201e1491fcf730272c706 git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/master compiler: gcc (GCC) 7.1.1 20170620 .config is attached Raw console output is attached. Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this bug yet. Use struct sctp_sack_info instead ============================================ WARNING: possible recursive locking detected 4.14.0-rc8-next-20171110+ #40 Not tainted -------------------------------------------- syz-executor6/21462 is trying to acquire lock: (&q->blk_trace_mutex){+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81760261>] blk_trace_remove+0x21/0x40 kernel/trace/blktrace.c:373 but task is already holding lock: (&q->blk_trace_mutex){+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81763b38>] blk_trace_setup+0x38/0x70 kernel/trace/blktrace.c:606 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario:#syz fix: blktrace: fix trace mutex deadlockThis is fixed in current -git.I know, but syzbot needed to be told what commit fixes the bug. See https://github.com/google/syzkaller/blob/master/docs/syzbot.md
Ah gotcha. -- Jens Axboe